Life takes us in many strange directions and wonderful discoveries. It never turns out the way we thought it would.
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
China Poised To Become The World's Largest Economy In 2015
April 30, 2014 1:01 am
China poised to pass US as world’s leading economic power this year
![[UNVERIFIED CONTENT] East Nanjing road, main shopping and touristic street in the centre of Shanghai, with many neon lights and crowded with people, at night. Shanghai, China](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sFupe98zA5gzUqyYBnRwhYfowgbJtZpgnWoB-XuHIJN5SBj4du1Hk33OpfFHJVnKMZu7sAk0IJDCRCmZMt1dEwEZ_8LlbkBcBD_hksN2HcXWTZU6ye4S45uyDgn83VtZFM84Ix1vDuDt0Gsed2ZrJ6Qj0=s0-d)
The US is on the brink of losing its status as the world’s largest economy, and is likely to slip behind China this year, sooner than widely anticipated, according to the world’s leading statistical agencies.
The US has been the global leader since overtaking the UK in 1872. Most economists previously thought China would pull ahead in 2019.
ON THIS STORY
- China overtakes the US your questions answered
- The World China set to pass US as largest economy
- Global Insight China craves global trade club membership
- Comment China’s crisis is coming
- China expected to show sharp slowdown
The figures, compiled by the International Comparison Program hosted by the World Bank, are the most authoritative estimates of what money can buy in different countries and are used by most public and private sector organisations, such as the International Monetary Fund. This is the first time they have been updated since 2005.
After extensive research on the prices of goods and services, the ICP concluded that money goes further in poorer countries than it previously thought, prompting it to increase the relative size of emerging market economies.
The estimates of the real cost of living, known as purchasing power parity or PPPs, are recognised as the best way to compare the size of economies rather than using volatile exchange rates, which rarely reflect the true cost of goods and services: on this measure the IMF put US GDP in 2012 at $16.2tn, and China’s at $8.2tn.
In 2005, the ICP thought China’s economy was less than half the size of the US, accounting for only 43 per cent of America’s total. Because of the new methodology – and the fact that China’s economy has grown much more quickly – the research placed China’s GDP at 87 per cent of the US in 2011.
For 2011, the report says: “The US remained the world’s largest economy, but it was closely followed by China when measured using PPPs”.
China’s crisis is coming – the only question is how big it will be
Financial crisis in China has become inevitable. If it happens soon, its effects can be contained. But, if policy makers use further doses of stimulus to postpone the day of reckoning, a severe collapse will become unavoidable within a few years.
The country is in the middle of by far the largest monetary expansion in history. On one widely used measure, M2, its money supply has tripled in the past six years, an expansion four times as large as that of the US over the same period.
With the IMF expecting China’s economy to have grown 24 per cent between 2011 and 2014 while the US is expected to expand only 7.6 per cent, China is likely to overtake the US this year.
The figures revolutionise the picture of the world’s economic landscape, boosting the importance of large middle-income countries. India becomes the third-largest economy having previously been in tenth place. The size of its economy almost doubled from 19 per cent of the US in 2005 to 37 per cent in 2011.
Russia, Brazil, Indonesia and Mexico make the top 12 in the global table. In contrast, high costs and lower growth push the UK and Japan further behind the US than in the 2005 tables while Germany improved its relative position a little and Italy remained the same.
The findings will intensify arguments about control over global international organisations such as the World Bank and IMF, which are increasingly out of line with the balance of global economic power.
When looking at the actual consumption per head, the report found the new methodology as well as faster growth in poor countries have “greatly reduced” the gap between rich and poor, “suggesting that the world has become more equal”.
The world’s rich countries still account for 50 per cent of global GDP while containing only 17 per cent of the world’s population.
Having compared the actual cost of living in different countries, the report also found that the four most expensive countries to live in are Switzerland, Norway, Bermuda and Australia, with the cheapest being Egypt, Pakistan, Myanmar and Ethiopia.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2014. You may share using our article tools.
Sunday, April 27, 2014
Some Important Work On The House Is Finished
I had to complete several projects here on the house. Things may change in our lives and the house had to be ready to sell. It is a big responsibility. The key to everything is to hire good people. I have a good crew that I have worked with for several years. When I need a new specialist, I go to www.yelp.com. Once the good people are chosen, one needs to pay them decent wages and treat them nicely. Also one needs to write good reports on them when they do a great job.
Saturday, April 26, 2014
20 Years Ago Today I Was Part Of An Incredible Moment In History
My dear friends 20 years ago today it was a sunny and cool morning in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. It was also a historical day. The first all-race election was being held. Thanks to the African National Congress, I was invited to vote in the election despite the fact that I was not a citizen of South Africa. A captain in the South African Army came to my door. He told me that he had been instructed to take me to the polls so that I could vote. We rode to the polling place in his 3-series BMW. There were armed soldiers all over the place. But things were mellow and calm. I felt no fear at all. The ballots all had pictures of the candidates because so many people could not read and write. I cast my ballot and was driven back home. In the evening I watched the election returns. Nelson Mandela won. The party afterwards throughout South Africa was incredible! My most unforgettable moment was a television interview that I saw. An African woman was being interviewed. She made the following comment:
"Now we will no longer be treated like children."
I owe a deep debt of gratitude to Nelson Mandela and his right-hand woman Barbara Joyce Masekela for making it possible for me to participate in this incredible moment in history.
Jack's Africa: Inequality Is The New Apartheid
Jack's Africa: Inequality Is The New Apartheid: ft.com > life&arts > FT Magazine Search Sign out ohomen171@gmail.com Your account ...
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Strip Private Banks Of Their Power To Create Money
April 24, 2014 1:32 pm
Strip private banks of their power to create money
By Martin WolfAuthor alerts
The giant hole at the heart of our market economies needs to be plugged
Printing counterfeit banknotes is illegal, but creating private money is not. The interdependence between the state and the businesses that can do this is the source of much of the instability of our economies. It could – and should – be terminated.
I explained how this works two weeks ago. Banks create deposits as a byproduct of their lending. In the UK, such deposits make up about 97 per cent of the money supply. Some people object that deposits are not money but only transferable private debts. Yet the public views the banks’ imitation money as electronic cash: a safe source of purchasing power.
ON THIS STORY
- Martin Wolf ‘Too big to fail’ remains
- Money Supply
- Martin Wolf Fear of hyperinflation
- Martin Wolf ‘The Bankers’ New Clothes’, by Admati and Hellwig
ON THIS TOPIC
- The Macro Sweep German business confidence rises
- Fund answer to bond investors’ dilemma
- Jacques de Larosière Securitised debt
- Wage rises seen as threat to low US rates
MARTIN WOLF
Banking is therefore not a normal market activity, because it provides two linked public goods: money and the payments network. On one side of banks’ balance sheets lie risky assets; on the other lie liabilities the public thinks safe. This is why central banks act as lenders of last resort and governments provide deposit insurance and equity injections. It is also why banking is heavily regulated. Yet credit cycles are still hugely destabilising.
What is to be done? A minimum response would leave this industry largely as it is but both tighten regulation and insist that a bigger proportion of the balance sheet be financed with equity or credibly loss-absorbing debt. I discussed this approach last week. Higher capital is the recommendation made by Anat Admati of Stanford and Martin Hellwig of the Max Planck Institute in The Bankers’ New Clothes .
A maximum response would be to give the state a monopoly on money creation. One of the most important such proposals was in the Chicago Plan, advanced in the 1930s by, among others, a great economist, Irving Fisher. Its core was the requirement for 100 per cent reserves against deposits. Fisher argued that this would greatly reduce business cycles, end bank runs and drastically reduce public debt. A 2012 study by International Monetary Fund staff suggests this plan could work well.
Similar ideas have come from Laurence Kotlikoff of Boston University in Jimmy Stewart is Dead, and Andrew Jackson and Ben Dyson in Modernising Money . Here is the outline of the latter system.
First, the state, not banks, would create all transactions money, just as it creates cash today. Customers would own the money in transaction accounts, and would pay the banks a fee for managing them.
Second, banks could offer investment accounts, which would provide loans. But they could only loan money actually invested by customers. They would be stopped from creating such accounts out of thin air and so would become the intermediaries that many wrongly believe they now are. Holdings in such accounts could not be reassigned as a means of payment. Holders of investment accounts would be vulnerable to losses. Regulators might impose equity requirements and other prudential rules against such accounts.
Third, the central bank would create new money as needed to promote non-inflationary growth. Decisions on money creation would, as now, be taken by a committee independent of government.
Finally, the new money would be injected into the economy in four possible ways: to finance government spending, in place of taxes or borrowing; to make direct payments to citizens; to redeem outstanding debts, public or private; or to make new loans through banks or other intermediaries. All such mechanisms could (and should) be made as transparent as one might wish.
The transition to a system in which money creation is separated from financial intermediation would be feasible, albeit complex. But it would bring huge advantages. It would be possible to increase the money supply without encouraging people to borrow to the hilt. It would end “too big to fail” in banking. It would also transfer seignorage – the benefits from creating money – to the public. In 2013, for example, sterling M1 (transactions money) was 80 per cent of gross domestic product. If the central bank decided this could grow at 5 per cent a year, the government could run a fiscal deficit of 4 per cent of GDP without borrowing or taxing. The right might decide to cut taxes, the left to raise spending. The choice would be political, as it should be.
Opponents will argue that the economy would die for lack of credit. I was once sympathetic to that argument. But only about 10 per of UK bank lending has financed business investment in sectors other than commercial property. We could find other ways of funding this.
Our financial system is so unstable because the state first allowed it to create almost all the money in the economy and was then forced to insure it when performing that function. This is a giant hole at the heart of our market economies. It could be closed by separating the provision of money, rightly a function of the state, from the provision of finance, a function of the private sector.
This will not happen now. But remember the possibility. When the next crisis comes – and it surely will – we need to be ready.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Monday, April 21, 2014
An Unforgettable Easter Sunday
It was a beautiful and a sunny Easter. Elena and I went for a hike at Robert W. Crown Memorial State Beach in Alameda, California. We took the dogs along. We had an incredible hike and discovered a magical part of Alameda that we did not know existed. The town made us feel like we were in a coastal city in Southern California. After a great hike with the dogs we explored downtown Alameda. We found a Mexican restaurant called La Penca Azul. It's a beautiful venue and large. Even at one thirty in the afternoon it was full of people and we had to wait for a while. When we did get a table we had an excellent meal and drinks. This was one of those beautiful and unforgettable days that we will always treasure.
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: Glen Greenwald Wins Pulitzer Prize for Exposing NSA Spy Scandal; His Reaction on Video; My Reaction: Greenwald and Snowden are Heroes
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: Illinois Madness Never Stops; House Committee Wants Taxpayers to Spend $100 Million on Barack Obama Library
Saturday, April 19, 2014
Jack's South America: Rio's Preparation For The 2016 Olympics Faces Cris...
Jack's South America: Rio's Preparation For The 2016 Olympics Faces Cris...: April 18, 2014 1:51 pm Rio’s preparation for 2016 Olympics faces crisis By Samantha Pearson in Rio de Janeiro ©Getty The Ol...
Jack's Africa: Gerrie Nel, Pistorius's Pit Bull Prosecutor
Jack's Africa: Gerrie Nel, Pistorius's Pit Bull Prosecutor: Gerrie Nel, Pistorius’s pit bull prosecutor By Andrew England South African lawyer, renowned as a battler in the cause of justice...
Friday, April 18, 2014
Thursday, April 17, 2014
Walmart Gets Massive Subsidies From US Taxpayers
On Tax Day, Taxpayers Pick up $8 Billion Tab
for Walmart and the Walton Family
for Walmart and the Walton Family
Report Provides State-by-State Estimates of Revenue Losses
WASHINGTON — Walmart and the Waltons—America’s largest employer and richest family—received tax breaks and subsidies worth an estimated $7.8 billion in 2013, according to a report released today by Americans for Tax Fairness. Released for Tax Day, when millions of American taxpayers and small businesses pay their fair share to support critical public services and the economy, the report shows Walmart and the Waltons have their own set of rules to game the system and get taxpayers to pick up the tab.
Walmart, which was number one on the Fortune 500 in 2013, had $16 billion in profits last year on revenues of $473 billion. The Walton family, which own more than 50 percent of Walmart shares, reaps billions in annual dividends from the company. The six Walmart heirs have a net worth of $148.8 billion—more wealth than 49 million American families combined.
The report shows that $7.8 billion is enough to hire 105,000 new public school teachers if Walmart paid its fair share of taxes and didn’t call on taxpayers to subsidize its low wages.
The report identifies the annual subsidies and tax breaks to Walmart and the Waltons, which include the following:
The report identifies the annual subsidies and tax breaks to Walmart and the Waltons, which include the following:
· Walmart receives an estimated $6.2 billion annually in mostly federal taxpayer subsidies. Walmart pays its employees so little that many of them rely on food stamps, Medicaid and other taxpayer-funded programs.
· Walmart avoids an estimated $1 billion in federal taxes each year. It uses tax breaks, including a strategy known as accelerated depreciation that allows it to write off capital investments considerably faster than the assets actually wear out.
· The Waltons avoided an estimated $607 million in federal taxes on their Walmart dividends which are taxed at a much lower rate than income from salaries and wages.
The report also includes state-by-state data on the cost of the tax breaks used by Walmart and the Walton family. In addition, it estimates Walmart revenue generated from sales of groceries to SNAP (food stamp) recipients in each state.
“This report shows that Americans pay a lot more than they think at Walmart,” said Frank Clemente, Executive Director at Americans for Tax Fairness. “The real cost of shopping at Walmart is much higher than what shows up on your cash register slip. Walmart’s exploitation of large taxpayer subsidies and tax loopholes means higher taxes for everyone else and less money to invest in schools and communities.”
“The most troubling findings in this report are how much Walmart rakes in selling its groceries to food stamps beneficiaries, while it fleeces taxpayers who are subsidizing the low wages and poor benefits Walmart pays its employees,” said Clemente. The report found that Walmart had 18 percent of food stamps sales last year, which were worth $13.5 billion, while its employees received $6.2 billion in taxpayer assistance from food stamps, Medicaid and other income- support programs.
“Major companies and leaders like Walmart and the Waltons are taking advantage of the tax system and leaving taxpayers to foot the bill,” said Clemente. “It’s time they paid their fair share like the rest of us do.”
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.
13 Responses to “Walmart on Tax Day: How Taxpayers Subsidizes America’s Biggest Employer and Richest Family”
Leave a Reply
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Monday, April 14, 2014
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: State Department Cannot Account for Billions of Contracts; It Can Account for $400,000 for Camel Statue in Pakistan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2014/04/federal-revenues-and-spending/#comment-700551
“…”Corporate taxes are a mere 13.5%”
~~~
“How sad that the biggest corporation in the US survives and dominates only because it can hire its workers at a discount because taxpayers subsidize their wages.”