Pages

Wednesday, September 30, 2020

American Faces Two Years In Prison For Defamation In Thailand

 

THAILAND

The Sword of Defamation

An American man could face prison in Thailand after posting negative online reviews of a hotel resort in the country, the Guardian reported Tuesday.

Wesley Barnes has been accused of launching “a slanderous campaign” against the Sea View Resort in Koh Chang. He faces two years in prison under the country’s draconian defamation laws.

Barnes, who lives in Thailand, was arrested this month and later released on bail. He will return to court on Oct. 6.

Barnes uploaded the negative reviews online following a bad experience with the management and staff of the hotel. One of the reviews accused the resort of “modern-day slavery.” He said, however, that the “slavery” review didn’t go through.

The resort said in a statement they tried contacting Barnes to resolve the dispute but later took legal action because multiple reviews were posted across different platforms.

Under Thai law, defamation is a criminal offense with a maximum sentence of two years in prison and a fine topping $6,000. Rights groups have warned that the law has been used to silence activists and journalists.


British Soldier Faces Murder Charges

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Open Wound

Northern Ireland’s Public Prosecution Service (PPS) upheld a decision to bring charges against only one British soldier for crimes committed during Bloody Sunday, one of the deadliest days in the region’s decades of violence, the BBC reported Tuesday.

The decision comes after the families of some of the victims requested a review of the cases of 15 British soldiers over their role in the death of 13 civil rights protesters and the wounding of 15 others in Londonderry on Jan. 30, 1972 or Bloody Sunday.

The PPS said that no new evidence has been found against the soldiers.

The victims’ families expressed disappointed at the verdict and their lawyers said that they will challenge the decision. Irish Prime Minister Michael Martin said that the PPS’ decision will “bring back pain and loss” for the families of the victims.

So far, only one defendant, Soldier F, has been charged: He faces two counts of murder and five counts of attempted murder.

British soldiers committed more than 300 of the nearly 3,700 slayings during four decades of conflict in Northern Ireland but accountability for those killings has been rare, the Associated Press reported.


Tuesday, September 29, 2020

It's Official-Our Mortgage Is Paid!!!

 

From: "noreply@mortgagefamily.com" <noreply@mortgagefamily.com>

Date: September 29, 2020 at 12:14:05 PM PDT

To: "etor38@hotmail.com" <etor38@hotmail.com>

Subject: Congratulations! The account is paid in full

 



Dear Customer(s),

 

 

<question.png>

 

Why We Are

Sending This Letter

Congratulations! Your account is paid in full. While this is a significant milestone, there are still a few important actions that need to happen over the next few weeks. If there is a positive balance in the escrow account, or if the payoff resulted in an overpayment, we will send a refund check to the mailing address on file. Though we strive to complete refunds quickly, please allow 20 business days to receive the refund.

European Unemployment Due To Coronavirus

 

EUROPEAN UNION

Down and Out in Paris, Milan and Prague

In the 1920s, American writers like Gertrude Stein and Ernest Hemingway fled their boring homeland to live in bohemian Paris. They were called the Lost Generation.

Now the term is being applied to young Europeans who have had to put off their careers twice in the early years of their lives – once due to the Eurozone crisis of 2009 and now because of the coronavirus pandemic that has crippled the continent’s economy.

“For millennials in their mid-30s, especially in southern Europe, bouts of economic misery could indeed be all that they have ever known,” wrote openDemocracy.

One of those millennials is Alessandro Margiotta: He got a job as a warehouse worker in Milan, Italy on a six-month contract, standard fare in a country where economic growth is meager, he told Politico. He had to stay home during the country’s lockdown, then lost the job when his boss said he could not renew his contract.

“My father helps me by paying for my gas, and doing the shopping,” Margiotta told Politico. “It is not easy. I can’t help but think: What if I had my own children?”

After Dunia Skaunicova received a degree in media marketing from Metropolitan University in Prague, the capital of the Czech Republic, she landed her “dream first job at a startup” that needed multilingual graduates, Reuters wrote. But she lost her job a few months later. Now she’s stuck.

Around 17 percent of people between the ages of 18 and 29 have lost their jobs in the pandemic worldwide. Those who remain employed have worked almost a quarter of fewer hours, according to the United Nations’ International Labor Organization.

In Europe, the situation was already tough for young people looking to begin their lives. But Covid-19 is making things worse. Unemployment among those under 25 increased to 15.7 percent, more than double the rate of older workers. In some southern countries, it’s twice that. One study found that youth unemployment in the European Union would increase from 2.8 to 4.8 million.

In addition to lost wages, missed opportunities and forestalled dreams today, prolonged periods of unemployment can hurt people’s chances of finding good jobs tomorrow.

Not all is doom and gloom. Germany reported improved business morale recently. But the New York Times predicted a potential “grinding downturn,” hardly a good omen, especially when one notes that the newspaper’s reporting on the European economy was far more optimistic in July.

The EU hopes to integrate financial markets more closely in a bid to jumpstart growth. That could boost the role of the euro in international commerce, Pensions & Investments wrote.

It will take more than high-level financial machinations, however, to help 20-somethings who desperately need direction in their lives – and a job.

W

Is Donald Trump A Fidel Castro Analog?

 

International Man Communique
Learning from Fidel
by Jeff Thomas
-

Fidel Castro was the longest-reigning political leader of the twentieth century. How did this one-time law student/protestor pull this off?

Well, as a protesting student, he made every mistake in the book, with particular emphasis on egotistically wanting always to be at the forefront and getting all the press.

His efforts were never well-thought through. He got by mostly on zeal and braggadocio.

Then, as an armed revolutionary, his first effort was an ill-conceived attempt to take over a fortified army barracks, which failed miserably, landing him in prison.

Having gained a pardon, he went into exile in Mexico, then foolishly sailed an overloaded boat to Cuba in questionable weather along with his co-conspirators. Luckily, he made it to the southeast coast but was promptly set upon by waiting government forces. Unlike many of his comrades, he escaped to the Sierra Madre, from where he accomplished only the occasional raid in the eastern cities.

Mister Castro, by any measure, was an unlikely candidate to become a success as a revolutionary.

But something else was working for him. The Cuban people were more than ready for a change. They were sick of leaders who subjugated Cuba to the American sugar interests, chronically impoverishing a third of the Cuban people.

They were willing to take a chance on virtually anyone who opposed the much-derided Fulgencio Batista, and when the revolutionaries marched to Havana, not only the townspeople along the way, but much of the military, joined them.

Mister Batista didn't even put up a fight. He simply got on a plane, looting the Treasury on his way out, and never returned.

As a national leader, Fidel had major shortcomings. He was impatient, a poor planner and had an almost childlike inability to understand economics and money management.

By all rights, this was a character who should, at best, have enjoyed a brief term as leader – to be replaced after the dust had settled on the revolution.

So how is it that he survived to become the longest-ruling political leader in the world and, perhaps more importantly, what does that mean to us today in our own fragmenting world?

Recommended Link
Doug Casey on Why All Fiat Currencies Are Burning Matches

Governments around the world are printing their fiat currencies by the trillions.

In this dispatch, legendary investor Doug Casey reveals what he expects to soon happen to the US dollar and other fiat currencies as this trend accelerates and what it means for your savings.

Click here for the details
-

Well, in addition to his personal shortcomings, he did have some very strong talents. He was very skilled at marketing and knew how to spin events to his advantage.

One of the first occasions on which this was revealed was when, some months after the revolution, counterinsurgencies took place.

They were guerrilla-based, as his own revolution had been, and although they never developed enough to be a major threat, they did provoke him to announce to the Cuban people that the revolution was ongoing, that the new government must remain armed and ready at all times and never let down their guard.

This resulted in the Cuban people accepting the notion that the police state that existed after the revolution was justified for as long as it proved necessary.

As the Cuba-based counterinsurgencies waned, several US-organised attempts to take out Fidel occurred, each one failing. This allowed him to thumb the collective Cuban nose at the Great US Empire and get away with it. Each time, he was cheered on by his people.

At some point along the way, Mister Castro realised that the endless promotion of a continued revolution could allow him to make use of martial law indefinitely – a situation that would not normally be tolerated by a nation of people after the threat was gone.

This worked so well that, as US attempts to assassinate him died down, he came up with his own theatrical events to extend the need for military posturing.

In later years, it was not uncommon to wake up in the morning in Havana, drive along the Malecon, and see that, during the night, heavy artillery emplacements had been installed along the avenue. The following day, in reading the national newspaper, Granma, an explanation would be offered.

The front-page article would describe yet another attempt by the US government to overthrow the Cuban government and reinstall the capitalists that had once ruled Cuba.

The article would state that Fidel's operatives were once again successful in finding out about the intended invasion ahead of time and, overnight, preparing for the invasion, ruining its chances. Once again, the Great US Empire had been outsmarted by Fidel.

Whilst such theatrical events may seem rather transparent to those outside Cuba, they were very effective locally.

First, they created great pride in Cubans that their small island could take on such a major power and outfox them time after time.

Second, they kept the Cuban people reminded that their leader had an exceptional ability retaliate against counterrevolutionary action at a moment's notice.

Whilst we can imagine that the theatrical events may possibly have taken weeks of preparation, Cubans saw only the results – overnight emplacement of artillery.

This also served a more subtle, but perhaps more important purpose: To this day, the Cuban people need very little military presence on the streets to be reminded that their government is not to be trifled with. Such presence today is less prominent than, say, in the US, and even police presence is not only less than in the US, but for the most part more benign. But Cubans have been programmed to behave themselves.

From that time on, Fidel Castro lived in his fortified compound outside Havana, in a comfort similar to that of a Columbian drug lord. At home, he often wore flowered shirts, but whenever he was seen in public, he wore military fatigues. He understood that, in the eyes of the Cuban people, the revolution must be ongoing, in order to maintain the totalitarian government on a permanent basis.

The US has, until recently, been mostly peaceful. Yet, Americans now witness violence in the streets every day on the evening news. Pundits on such programmes ask, "What can be done to return America's communities to safety and peace?"

The obvious answer would be for the populace to demand that the federal government step in. And a marketing-conscious government may well use this anomaly to justify federally ordered force.

It matters little who's killed in the riots, whether it be police, rioters or bystanders. Once martial law is introduced, it should not be surprising if the problem of violence never quite goes away – if the "temporary" police state becomes permanent, in the name of "safety."

It may be that Americans will discover that the cure is more threatening than the illness. And if Mister Castro's success is an accurate example of how this will turn out, the reign of the post-2020 government may well be not only tyrannical, but long-lived.

Editor's Note: We are heading for the double whammy of a political crisis and a thundering financial breakdown at the same time.

This perfect storm will gravely impact the personal liberty and financial security of EVERYONE.

Monday, September 28, 2020

Xenophobia Stopped In Switzerland!!!!!!

 

SWITZERLAND

No Wall, Please

Swiss voters soundly rejected a referendum that would have terminated an accord with the European Union on the free movement of people in a vote that resembled the Brexit referendum in 2016, the Guardian reported.

Near-final results on Sunday showed that nearly 62 percent of the voters rejected the proposal pushed by the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which is also the largest party in parliament.

Non-nationals comprise roughly a quarter of Switzerland’s 8.6 million inhabitants and the SVP believes the country should control the number of foreigners allowed to settle in Switzerland. The proposal was opposed by the government, business leaders and parliamentarians, who argued that ending the free movement agreement could severely impact Switzerland’s economy.

Switzerland – a non-EU member – has signed more than 120 bilateral treaties with the bloc since 2002: These regulate trade, transport and research among other issues. If the free movement principle would have been terminated, it would have automatically canceled all bilateral agreements under a so-called “guillotine clause.”

The SVP has tried before to limit free movement between Switzerland and the bloc: In 2014, it narrowly won a referendum to implement immigration quotas. However, the initiative was watered down, allowing a degree of flexibility for cantons in some sectors but also crucially imposing no fixed limits on EU immigration.

IS

Ice Station Kurt - The Secret German Mission to Canada

Thursday, September 24, 2020

Where We Stand With Ghislaine Maxwell Unsealing Process || #Rodeslav

Our 12 Year Battle To Pay Off Our House

 

Some 15.5 years ago when you came to live at our house, we sat down. We had a father/daughter talk. I told you that the two hardest jobs that you would have in life would be independent thinking and being a mother. I went on to clarify independent thinking with the following words:

       "When everybody in the world tells you that you are wrong. When everybody in the world tells you that you are crazy. And you know that you are right, go ahead and do it!!"

        I shall dedicate these words to Elena today. I want to share with you the story of the 12 year battle to hold onto our house when 6.5 million other houses were foreclosed. I shall tell you about the battle to pay it off.

          2006-2008 was a heddy time. Houses kept going up in price geometrically. When a house came for sale around here, there were ten competing offers. A massive bubble built based on weak and poorly thought out loans. The bubble burst in 2008. Housing prices collapsed. We were living in a house that was falling apart structurally. It was infested with rats. As we lay down to sleep at night, we could hear rats running around in the ceiling above us. Despite all these deficiencies the house was worth more than $845,000 US. When the bubble burst, the house was worth $395,000. The debt on the house was $745,000. We were "underwater" $350,000. We knew that we would need some $250,000 to fix the house and bring it up to liveable standards. Our deficit grew to $600,000.

    I urged Elena to walk away from the house. Real Estate agents and lawyers urged her to walk away from the house. Elena refused to do this. She said that in her home country of Argentina, people did not abandon their homes. Elena had such conviction and strength that I decided to go along with her.

     What happened next was millions of people who stopped paying their home loans. President Obama came to power. He initiated a mortgage foreclosure moratorium. He demanded that banks do loan modifications.

       Our first battle was to get our insane home loan modified. It was hundreds of pages and a 16-month battle. I thought that our fax machine was going to melt because so many documents were going through it. At the end we got a modified loan@ 6% interest. Our debt increased by the amount of loan payments that we had not made for 16 months. This loan cost us interest charges of $36,000 per year. They refused to allow us to pay off the loan early. We were sentenced to 30 years of brutal interest charges.

    I filed in Federal bankruptcy court to get a $145,000 second lien from Wells Fargo Bank voided. The bank took this proposal seriously. They sent a famous lawyer named Austin Nagle to oppose. I got beaten in court this time.

     In June of 2011, we took $47,000 in savings and started the job to fix the house. It was a massive undertaking that went on until early 2012. Someway, somehow, we were able to raise another $200,000 US to make it happen without borrowing any money. The house became livable.

      Elena and I had been working with The Comfort Law Firm on the Wells Fargo second lien. A brilliant negotiator named Alan Sherman took over the case. He worked a miracle. Wells Fargo agreed to cancel the loan if we would pay off $20,000 US of the loan. We had the $20,000 because we were frugal and careful.

        We faced another challenge. The $120,000 forgiven loan was deemed to be income by the Internal Revenue Service. We were facing a state and Federal tax bill of $40,000 US. I read an obscure article by a New York Times author on such income tax matters. Without a tax lawyer or tax accountant, I prepared a 40-page submission for the IRS proving that Elena was insolvent at the time the loan was forgiven. The IRS grumbled and growled at me. They then agreed with me.

    The real estate market recovered. In the summer of 2015, we applied for a better loan on the house. We approached our financial institution-Sacramento Credit Union. They are good people. They have very high standards. We had to present a pile of papers to prove every part of our financial life. It seemed to be unending. We doubted that we would get the loan. We got a nice surprise with an approval in August of 2015. There was one obstacle. The loan came in $40,000 US less than the amount owed to Bank of America. We had to pay the difference. We were not allowed to borrow the $40,000 US to pay the difference.

        Again, we were frugal and careful with money. We had the $40,000 saved. We had to present another pile of documents to prove that the money was not borrowed. We prevailed. In early September of 2015, Elena signed for a loan of $507,000 US with a ten-year term.

         We set the goal of paying off the loan in 5 years. It was a battle but we made it happen. As the dust settles our house is worth somewhere between $1,200,000-$1,300,000 in value. Elena's independent thinking and strength paid off.

 

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

Sniffing Out The Virus

 

Sniffing out the virus

Finland has trained some very good dogs.

The country today began offering coronavirus tests for passengers at Helsinki’s airport, conducted by canine specialists that have been trained to sniff out SARS-CoV-2.

Travelers who take the voluntary test are asked to rub their necks with a wipe to collect sweat samples, and then leave the wipe in a box. A dog trainer puts the box behind a wall, along with cans that contain different scents. Researchers say the dogs can detect a coronavirus-infected person in 10 seconds, with a 94 percent success rate.

Dogs have long been known to detect other illnesses, like cancer and malaria, and researchers say they are easily able to sniff out the coronavirus, even in a person who is asymptomatic. The exact mechanics are not yet known, but experts say the dogs are most likely identifying the presence of excreted virus in human sweat.


Some New Insights On The Battle Of Kursk

 

The most interesting thing about the Battle of Kursk is that it’s a fraud.

In order to cover up the enormous Russian losses that were sustained in the Russian victory over the Germans, despite having weeks and months to prepare, the leaders of the Russian armies made up a lot of the data. They pretended there was this enormous “clash of armour”. They tripled the number of tanks the Germans actually had. They put Tigers and Panthers and Elefants in the hands of units that had no tanks.

And until the fall of the Soviet Union everyone believed them.

The first major Western work on Kursk was Paul Carrell’s “Scorched Earth” published in 1963. He based his research solely on Russian propaganda and never once examined the German records on the battle held in the US Army archives. His book was used as primary source material for every work afterwards. Carrell claimed that “a gigantic clash of armor and anti-tank guns” took place at Kursk, with somewhere between 1500 and 1600 tanks taking part. Some historians have stated there were as many as 1900 tanks involved, including hundreds of Tiger tanks. There were only 45 Tiger tanks involved in the entire battle. In truth the Russians had about 850 tanks and the Germans had about 350 tanks and at any given time these tanks were often hundreds of kilometers apart. In the biggest part of the tank battle the Germans had no more than 62 tanks in the primary battle. More then 150 of the Russian tanks were over 100 kilometers from the battlefield and never fired a round. In the main area of combat it can be said that fewer than half the reported 1500 tanks were ever even near each other.

The overall commander for the Russians, Rotmistrov, told a fable of huge proportions to Stalin to account for the enormous Soviet losses - in one case almost 80 Soviet tanks destroyed by two battalions of the Grossdeutchland who didn’t even have a single tank. Marshall Vasilevsky, as Chief of Staff of the Soviet Army said he viewed the massive tank battle “with his own eyes” when he was nowhere near it.

In 1996 Soviet historian Grigoryi Koltunuv, the primary reporter for the Soviets on the battle said to a group of NATO officers in a briefing, “I have committed forgeries and I have lied. I was ordered to exaggerate German losses and to minimize Red Army casualties far below genuine figures. My works cannot, therefore, be taken seriously.” (exact quote).

The myth of the “greatest tank battle of all time” is just that - a myth. The Battle of Brody and even the Battle of Bautzen at the end of the war were bigger tank battles. There have been many bigger tank battles.

The Battle of Kursk was a titanic battle spanning weeks in July, 1943, and it was a triumphant victory for the Red Army - but it was not the massive armor clash the world has thought.

Source: Blood, Myth and Steel by George Nipe

39 comments from Ernie Dunbar and more

Saturday, September 19, 2020

Secret Russian Aircraft of WWII

Project Extraversion | American jets sent to Europe during WWII

Justice Ginsburg And A Tested 2020 Presidential Election

 

Justice Ginsburg And A Contested Presidential Election 2020

I am heartbroken over the death of Justice Ginsburg. My wife Elena pointed out something that I had not considered. If Trump contests the presidential election, it will go to the US Supreme Court as Gore vs. Bush did. We will have only 8 justices to hear the case. Even if Mitch McConnell was able to get another justice into the confirmation process, statistically it would take over 70 days to get the new justice confirmed.

Thursday, September 17, 2020

My Hero Talks About Capitalism

 

Jonathan Burton's Life Savings

Billionaire investor Ray Dalio on capitalism’s crisis: The world is going to change ‘in shocking ways’ in the next five years

Veteran hedge-fund manager says capitalists don’t divide the economic pie well, so the system isn’t working effectively for all

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates LP, the world’s largest hedge-fund firm.

 BLOOMBERG

Referenced Symbols

Ray Dalio certainly is no radical idealist, but in his frequent writings and media appearances the veteran investor consistently calls for Americans to rewrite their longstanding contract with capitalism so that it is fairer and more generous to more people.

Otherwise, he predicts, life in the U.S. could become more difficult: mountainous debt that stunts economic growth; fewer opportunities for ordinary citizens to get ahead financially; and a worldwide lack of trust in the U.S. dollar that diminishes Americans’ purchasing power and could lower their standard of living.

Dalio is the founder of Bridgewater Associates, the world’s largest hedge-fund firm, which has made him a billionaire. So it’s not surprising that he champions capitalism as a proven way to expand economic growth and living standards.

“Capitalism and capitalists are good at increasing and producing productivity to increase the size of the economic pie,” he says.

Then Dalio stands this tenet on its head. Capitalists don’t divide the economic pie very well, he says, and so today the capitalist system, the foundation of the U.S. economy, is not working efficiently and effectively enough for all.

“Capitalism also produces large wealth gaps that produce opportunity gaps, which threaten the system,” Dalio says — a system that has been and still is key to the health and success of U.S. business, workers, government and investors alike.

Unless the U.S. takes steps to make systemic repairs designed to provide greater opportunity for more Americans to achieve personal growth and financial security, the consequences likely will be painful for the country, as Dalio explains in this recent telephone interview, which has been edited for length and clarity:

MarketWatch: You have written and spoken about three big domestic and international problems facing the U.S. over the next five to 10 years and how a failure to address these challenges could threaten America’s standing in the world. What are these three pressing problems?

Ray Dalio: I look at it mechanically, like a doctor looking at a disease. If asked what is the issue here, I would say that it is a certain type of disease that has certain patterns which are timeless and universal, and the United States is broadly following that progression.

There are three problems that are coming together, so it’s important to understand them individually and how they collectively make a bigger problem.

There is a money and credit cycle problem, a wealth and values gap problem, and an emerging great power challenging the existing dominant power problem. What’s going on is an economic downturn together with a large wealth gap and the rising power of China challenging the existing power of the United States.

It’s a fact that there has been a weakening of the competitive advantages of the United States over the last couple of decades. For example, the United States lost a lot of the education advantage relative to other countries, our share of world GDP is reduced, the wealth gap has increased which has contributed to our political and social polarization.

But we haven’t lost all of our competitive advantages. For example in innovation and technology, the United States is still the strongest, but China is coming on very strong and at existing rates will surpass the United States. Militarily, the U.S. is stronger but China also has come on very strong and is probably stronger in the waters close to China that include Taiwan and other disputed areas. Finances for both countries are challenging, but for the U.S. more so. The U.S. is in the late stages of a debt cycle and money cycle in which we’re producing a lot of debt and printing a lot of money. That’s a problem. As a reserve currency status, the U.S. dollar DXY, -0.32%  is still dominant though its being threatened by its central bank printing of money and increasing the debt production problem. 

‘The United States is a 75-year-old empire and it is exhibiting signs of decline.’

MarketWatch: Focusing on the money and credit problem, excessive debt can be a killer for businesses and families, but most people don’t seem to recognize that debt plays havoc with their country’s finances as well. Government runs the money printing press, which buys time, but eventually something’s got to give.

Dalio: If you look at the history — for example, the Dutch Empire, the British Empire — both experienced the creation of debt and the printing of money, less educational advantages, greater internal wealth conflict, greater challenges from rival countries. Every country has stress tests. If you look at British history, the development of rival countries led them to lose their competitive advantages. Their finances were bad because they had accumulated a lot of debt. So, after World War II those trends went against them. Then they had the Suez Canal incident and they were no longer a world power and the British pound is no longer a reserve currency.  These diseases almost always play out the same way.  

The United States’ relative position in the world, which was dominant in almost all these categories at the beginning of this world order in 1945, has declined and is exhibiting real signs that should raise worries. There’s a lot of baggage. The U.S. has a lot of debt, which is adding to the hurdles that typically drag an economy down, so in order to succeed, you have to do a pretty big debt restructuring. History shows what kind of a challenge that is.

I just want to present understanding and facts. There’s a life cycle. You’re born and you die. As you get older you can see certain things that are symptoms of being later on in life. To know the life cycle and to know that these symptoms are emerging is what I’m trying to convey. The United States is a 75-year-old empire and it is exhibiting signs of decline. If you want to extend your life, there are clear things you can do, but it means doing things that you don’t want to do.

‘Wealth cannot be created by creating debt and money.’

MarketWatch: Let’s put it bluntly: Is capitalism broken?

Dalio: I wouldn’t say broken as much as I’d say it has problems that have to be fixed. As I said, I’m not ideological, I’m mechanical. I look at everything operationally like a machine and what has been shown is that capitalism is a fabulous way of creating incentives and innovation and of allocating resources to create productivity. All successful countries have uses for it. For example, communist China has chosen capitalism, which has been essential to its growth.

But capitalism also produces large wealth gaps that produce opportunity gaps, which threaten the system in the ways we are seeing now. Wealth gaps give unfair advantages to the children of rich people because they get a better education, which undermines the equal opportunity notion. As the number of people who get equal opportunity diminishes, this reduces the possibility of finding talented people in that population, which isn’t fair and undermines productivity. Then the have-nots want to tear down the capitalist system at a time of bad economic conditions. That dynamic has always existed in history and it’s happening now. 

The capitalist system is based on profit-seeking being the resource allocation system, which generally works well but doesn’t always. So, capitalism and capitalists are good at increasing and producing productivity to increase the size of the economic pie, but they’re not good at dividing the economic opportunity pie. Socialists are generally not good at increasing productivity and the size of the economic opportunity pie, but they are better at dividing the pie. 

We now have too much emphasis on distributing wealth and getting it from producing debt and printing money, and not enough from increasing productivity. Wealth cannot be created by creating debt and money. We have to be productive together, so we have to look at the good investments that we can make together that make total sense, like in education, and create equal opportunity in order to be productive.

We have to be in this together. The system needs to be reengineered to do this. But if we don’t do this engineering well, we’re going to spend in an unlimited way and deal with that by creating debt that won’t ever be paid back, and we will risk losing the reserve currency status of the dollar. If we get into that position — and we’re very close — things will get much worse because we are living on borrowed money that’s financing our consumption. 

‘Within the next five years you could see a situation in which foreigners who have been lending money to the United States won’t want to.’

MarketWatch: About the dollar being threatened as the world’s reserve currency — what does “close” mean, and what would the decline of this status mean for Americans?

Dalio: Within the next five years you could see a situation in which foreigners who have been lending money to the United States won’t want to, and the dollar would not be as readily accepted for making purchases in the world as it is now.

We have to realize that we’re spending more than we’re earning. Every individual, every company and every country has an income statement and a balance sheet. The income statement is how much is your earnings are relative to your expenses. If your earnings are greater than your expenses, great, you will increase your balance sheet. If your earnings are less than your expenses, then you have to draw on your balance sheet. 

The United States doesn’t have a good income statement and balance sheet in dealing with the rest of the world. It is running a deficit to the rest of the world that is financed by borrowing money so that we are producing liabilities. Our living standards are based on our spending, not on our income statement or balance sheet. If the U.S. loses that ability and it doesn’t force itself to be more productive, one day it will lose that ability to borrow and then will have to cut spending, which is painful.

When that pain happens at a time when you have the population at each other’s throats over money, that’s a toxic combination. People can’t take a downturn and have less buying power. So, necessarily the poor will have to be getting money from the rich and the rich are going to want to prevent that, and then if it gets bad enough, that it messes up productivity. 

Read: The Fed is ‘fighting the last battle,’ and here are the risks to its new strategy

Also read: This new ETF is made for “black-swan” moments like now

‘When the causes people are fighting for are more important to them than the system that binds them together, the system is in jeopardy.’

MarketWatch: What steps do politicians and business leaders need to take now to create and implement reforms that will fortify the U.S. balance sheet and the dollar’s status?

Dalio: In brief, productivity and equal opportunity are most needed. If we could at least agree that we must have these things, that would be great. What we have now is a situation in which we’re fighting each other, we are not providing equal opportunity, and we are losing our productivity gains. 

One of the greatest problems is that everybody’s fighting for their cause. When the causes people are fighting for are more important to them than the system that binds them together, the system is in jeopardy. This seems to now be happening. Everybody has their cause and they’re almost losing sight of the overall picture. Democracy depends on compromise. It’s the notion of compromise and working together and being able to have a negotiation to get what the most people want rather than have one side beat the other.

You really have to take the relative parties and make them agree on what’s going to be best. The group has got to be bipartisan and they have to be knowledgeable. Bring together parties of opposing ideologies who are also knowledgeable, not just smart but who are on the ground, to come up with a  plan together that all can support so that we’re productive, increasing the size of the pie and dividing it well. It would be great if whoever the president is could draw upon people from both parties and different perspectives.

MarketWatch: As Americans prepare for a presidential election in November, the three major problems you mentioned earlier would seem to be important factors for voters to consider.

Dalio: Yes. The world is going to change in the next five years in shocking ways in relation to the three big issues we have been talking about. 

First, there’s a debt-money cycle — what is the value of money? What will happen to the debt? Will the dollar retain its value? The finances of this — who is going to pay for it? How? What will work? That’s number one.

Second, the wealth, opportunity and values gaps will have to be dealt with. Are we going to be at each other’s throats in a way that is harmful or are we going to be working together even if things get worse? 

Third is the rising of a great power in China to challenge the existing power of the United States. Will this be well handled?

We will be dealing with these issues in the next presidential term, which will have a huge effect on our outcomes. The last time those three things existed as they do now was the 1930 to 1945 period. That’s the last time you had zero interest rates and money printing. That’s the last time you had the wealth and political gaps as large as they are today, and it was the last time you had rising powers challenging the existing world order. This and many analogous times before it help to give us perspective. 

‘Worry as much about the value of your money as you worry about the value of your investments.’

MarketWatch: These and other domestic and international challenges will clearly affect Americans financially. What would be a smart, proactive strategy for investors to both protect a portfolio and take advantage of market opportunities?

Dalio: First, worry as much about the value of your money as you worry about the value of your investments. The printing of money and the debt should make you aware of that. That’s why financial asset prices have gone up — stocks, gold — because of the debt and money creation. You don’t want to own the thing you think is safest — cash. 

Second, know how to diversify well. That includes diversification of countries, currencies and assets, because wealth is not so much destroyed as it shifts. When something goes down, something else is going up so you have to look at all things on a relative basis. Diversify well and worry about the value of cash. 

Americans look at the value of everything in U.S. dollars, but they don’t look at the value of the dollar. You’re in an environment where you have to be cautious about that, because the easiest way out for government is to do what the U.S. just did, which is to borrow and print a lot of money. They don’t have to get it from anyone, because when they raise taxes they have to get it from somebody and that somebody squawks. The population doesn’t pay much attention to the debt and the printing of money. They all appreciate the giving of money. So you hear the population say, “I need more money,” and get angry if they don’t get it. So you’ve got to give them more money, and it’s easier not to take it away from someone else. 

Read: Billionaire investor Ray Dalio fears for the dollar and the ‘soundness of our money,’ and here’s why

Plus: Investors could be looking at a ‘lost decade’ in the stock market, the world’s biggest hedge fund warns