Yesterday, I was overjoyed that Russia and Ukraine had reached an agreement to allow up to 22 million metric tons of Ukrainian grain to be exported. The New York Times celebrated this agreement this morning.
Barron's Magazine came out with a warning
article this morning that big food shortages are going to be a part of our
lives for a while. Here is the complete article:
y Lisa
BeilfussFollowing
July 22,
2022 2:30 pm ET
Solar farms
like this one in Andrews County, Texas, are gobbling up prime farmland. Some
observers see a long-term threat to the nation’s food supply.
Matthew
Busch/Bloomberg
Text size
Listen to
article
Length7
minutes
As financial
markets and media remain focused on recession timing and debate over when the
Federal Reserve will flip to cutting interest rates, growing threats to the
U.S. food supply—exacerbated by government policy—go underappreciated.
Concerns of
a global food shortage have been mounting given the war in Ukraine and the huge
amounts of fertilizer, wheat, and other food-related exports that come from
that region. Many economists and strategists say a food shortage can’t happen
here. After all, the U.S. produces most of its own food and roughly half of
domestic land is used for agricultural production, according to the Food and
Drug Administration. There are several overlapping reasons, however, why
America shouldn’t take a sufficient food supply for granted.
Eva Slatter,
a farrier in Emory, Texas, travels from farm to farm to take care of horses’
hoofs and has a small farm of her own. Her neighbor is selling his herd of
cows, and a local livestock auction earlier this month brought out more
trailers than she had ever seen, with ranchers looking to sell backed up for
miles. Record temperatures and the worst drought in more than a decade mean
there isn’t grass for the animals to eat, and hay—the alternative—is tough to
come by as higher fuel costs make it harder to transport from other states. The
cost of hay in her area is around $220 a roll, compared with about $45 in
normal times and $120 in a typical drought year, she says.
“None of the
ranchers I know want to get out, but they have to,” Slatter says of the
livestock liquidation. “Everybody is selling because they can’t feed them, and
no one is buying the cows to raise.” That suggests more meat and lower prices
in the near term. But the Texas Farm Bureau said in a report this past week
that with much of the current breeding herd going to processing plants, calf
numbers will fall in years ahead. As Slatter puts it, if everyone sells out of
cattle now, what are we going to do later on?
About 250
miles away from Slatter, Stephen Brantley is getting nervous—but for a
different reason. Brantley, a longtime banker at Waggoner National Bank in
Vernon, Texas, says his bank has been fielding calls lately from farmers
approached by solar companies interested in their land. First the companies ask
to test the land over about a year, during which time the farmer can continue
growing crops such as wheat. Then, if the testing goes well, the solar company
either offers to buy the land or lease it for 20 to 30 years.
RELATED
MARKET DATA
Commodities
& Futures
The offers are
hard to refuse. Farmland often best meets solar-site requirements, and Brantley
says solar companies are paying as much as $800 an acre in his area of the
wheat belt for leases that last for decades. That’s $512,000 a year for a
section of land—640 acres—an attractive lifeline for farmers increasingly
strapped by rising input prices and unfavorable weather. There is also a
precedent. Wind came in about 15 years ago and turbines proliferated in the
area, overall a net positive, Brantley says. But unlike wind, which is less
lucrative and can coexist with crops, solar is pretty zero sum. “I know how
fast it can happen. I’m afraid this thing might snowball. If solar catches on
like wind did, all this cultivated land will go out of production,” says
Brantley.
So far solar
hasn’t started to really move into the Midwest, where the soil is considered
superior, says University of Illinois ag professor Nick Paulson. It makes
sense, he says, for solar companies to be more aggressive in a place like Texas
given the relative quality of the farmland and more pervasive droughts. Still,
Texas and Oklahoma represent about a quarter of planted acres of wheat in the
U.S.
One part of
the story is that investors have sought farmland as an inflation hedge. Bill
Gates, the largest private owner of U.S. farmland, said on social-media
platform Reddit earlier this year that his investment group is buying the land.
A May report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago said agricultural land
values in the region surged 23% in the first quarter from a year earlier as
investors bought a rising share of some of the country’s best farmland.
Strategic Solar Group, which brokers land, says the high end of the average
solar-farm lease is $2,000 an acre.
Another part
of the story involves the government’s green agenda. While President Biden’s
climate legislation suffered a new setback when Sen. Joe Manchin this month
pulled his support, some lawmakers and analysts predict Biden will issue
executive actions. To achieve Biden’s goal for 100% clean electricity in the
U.S. by 2035, the Energy Department says solar deployment will need to
quadruple. Land.com, a marketplace for rural real estate, says generating
electricity solely from solar farms would take 13 million acres—or double that
to account for energy storage, electric vehicle charging stations, and the
necessary increase in electrical infrastructure. Apart from business
incentives, government subsidies and tax credits also help explain why solar
companies are aggressively seeking land.
Newsletter
Sign-up
Review &
Preview
Every
weekday evening we highlight the consequential market news of the day and
explain what's likely to matter tomorrow.
PREVIEW
SUBSCRIBED
Biden has
pushed solar further into the mainstream than ever before, says Texas A&M
University law and engineering professor Felix Mormann. There is lots of merit
to seeking reduced emissions, cleaner air, and cheaper energy. But, Mormann
asks, who ultimately pays for public spending on this scale and who will reap
the economic benefits? The flip side of that question: At whose expense will
those economic benefits be reaped?
Already,
Americans have seen double-digit price increases in food categories this year.
In the latest consumer price index report, meats, poultry, fish, and eggs leapt
12% from a year earlier as bread rose 11% and milk increased 16%. That’s
occurring as the U.S. Census Bureau has found about a 10th of Americans don’t
have enough to eat.
News of a
deal between Russia and Ukraine to resume Ukrainian grain exports via the Black
Sea should cool some commodity prices. But Paulson at the University of
Illinois says falling food-commodity prices may not easily translate to less
expensive food, in part because still-high oil makes up such a big portion of
U.S. food costs. Given the short supply of domestic oil, together with the
impact of severe droughts and the war in Ukraine, the timing of solar’s
encroachment on U.S. farmland may be cause for concern.
Write to
Lisa Beilfuss at lisa.beilfuss@barrons.com
No comments:
Post a Comment