Pages

Showing posts with label Israeli Attack On Iranian Nuclear Facilities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israeli Attack On Iranian Nuclear Facilities. Show all posts

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Further On a Possible Israeli Attack On Iranian Nuclear Facilities


Further discussions were had last night on a possible attack by Israel on Iranian nuclear facilities. Please bear in mind that the people who control political and military power in Israel see a nuclear-armed Iran as an "armageddon scenario." They are sure that Iran will use nuiclear weapons to destroy Israel. In their minds, Iran has to be stopped from obtaining nuclear weapons at all costs!!!!!!

The USA is under intense political pressure from the very powerful American Jewish lobby. Unnoticed recently by most was shipment of conventional "bunker busters" and other advanced munitions designed for attacking such facilities to Israel. These weapons will allow Israel to carry out the attack without having to use tactical nuclear weapons.

There has also been a lot of activity between Britain and Israel as of late. I suspect that the British have also supplied Israel with some advanced weapons and unofficially given their blessings to such an attack.

How do I think that Israel will carry out the attack? They certainly will not use manned aircraft as they would have to fly long distances over hostile territory and possible have to depend on US mid air refueling capabilities.

The Israelis will launch cruise missile from submaries. Some cruise missiles wil be launched from Israel. The Israelis also have a new missile system that could be used to deliver warheads to Iran.

How will the attack be carried out? Let us look at the simple example of wounding a bear or mountain lion. The animal will become enraged and retaliate fiercely, As those of us who have lived in areas of the American west where there are lots of bears and mountain lions, one has to deliver an overwhelming blow to knock the animal down. The nuclear facilities will be attacked. Iranina militray and Revolutioinay Guards command and control facilities wil be attacked. Also oil production facilities will be attacked so as to economically cripple Iran.

The consequences of such an attack will be severe. Whether the US is activly involved or not, they will get blamed for involvement in the attack. Europe gets 25% of its oil from Iran. They are already in severe economic problems with the debt iussues. This attack will push them "over the brink." Likewise the economies of Japan and India will be badly hurt as they depend on Iranian oil.

We will see oil prices go up to between $250.00 to $400.00 per barrel. This will thrown the world into a deep recession or even depression. Gold will go up to who knows what price?

Iran will also retaliate against the US and Israel. Terrorist attacks will be stepoped up. US military assets in the Persian Gulf will be attacked. It's going to get very ugly!

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Israeli Priosner Swap May Be Prelude To Attack On Iran


Israeli prisoner swap may be prelude to attack on Iran

ANALYSIS:
JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to execute a 1,000-for-1 prisoner exchange last week despite his frequently voiced opposition to such lopsided deals is seen by several Israeli military commentators as an effort to “clear the deck” before possibly undertaking an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Amir Oren, the veteran military analyst for Ha'aretz newspaper, took note of Israel’s exchanging 1,027 Palestinian convicts for army Staff Sgt. Gilad Schalit, who had been captured by Hamas in 2006. Mr. Orenwrote that the price paid by Mr. Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak “can be interpreted only in a context that goes beyond that of the Gilad Schalit deal.”
He noted that Israeli leaders in the past have shown a readiness to absorb “a small loss” in order to attain a greater success, generally involving “some sort of military adventure.”
Mr. Oren also noted that, until recently, Mr. Netanyahu had faced opposition to attacking Iran from Army Chief of Staff Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi and Mossad intelligence chief Meir Dagan. Both retired earlier this year and have been replaced by men believed to hold a different view on Iran.
Released Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit (second from right) walks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left), Defense Minister Ehud Barak (left) and Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz at the Tel Nof Air base in southern Israel on Oct. 18, 2011. Looking thin, weary and dazed, Schalit returned home Tuesday from more than five years of captivity in the Gaza Strip in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners whose joyful families greeted them with massive celebrations. (Associated Press/Defense Ministry)Released Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit (second from right) walks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left), Defense Minister Ehud Barak (left) and Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz at the Tel Nof Air base in southern Israel on Oct. 18, 2011. Looking thin, weary and dazed, Schalit returned home Tuesday from more than five years of captivity in the Gaza Strip in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners whose joyful families greeted them with massive celebrations. (Associated Press/Defense Ministry)
The Islamic republic has not been a top agenda item since the outbreak of the Arab Spring. YetIran’s nuclear program, which Western nations believe is geared for making an atomic bomb, has remained a key concern, despite Tehran’s denials that it is seeking to build a nuclear weapon.
According to Israeli media reports, a shift in the Israeli government’s views on Iran might have prompted Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s Middle East visit in April: His main mission was to pass on a warning from President Obama against any unilateral attack onIran.
At a press conference with Mr. Barak in April, Mr. Panetta stressed that any steps against Iran’s nuclear program must be taken in coordination with the international community.
This week, Jerusalem Post military correspondent Yakov Katz wrote that, with the Schalit chapter behind it, “Israel can now move forward to deal with some of the other strategic problems it faces in the region, such asIran’s nuclear program.” Had Israel first attacked Iran, Hamas‘ patron, it would have endangered the Schalit deal, Mr. Katz said.
Writing in Yediot Achronot, Alex Fishman said that for Mr. Netanyahu, who built a political career as a warrior on terror, the Schalit deal was a very courageous step, particularly in view of an estimate by Israel’s security services that 60 percent of Palestinians who are released in such exchanges return to terror.
“He took a risk in a certain area and thereby focused all our attention on much more troubling fronts — in distant Iran and in the Arab revolutions around us,” Mr. Fishman wrote. To deal with these problems, national consensus is necessary and the freeing of Gilad Shalit went far toward achieving that.
Mr. Oren offered another insight that he says may point Mr. Netanyahu toward military action againstIran.
Although the prime minister failed to make any enduring mark on history during his previous term or so far during his present term, Mr. Netanyahu may see Iran as an opportunity to achieve his Churchillian moment, Mr. Oren wrote. “The day is not far off, Netanyahu believes, when Churchill will emerge from him.”