Pages

Monday, May 31, 2021

A Six Month's Supply Of Food In The House

 

Today Elena expended incredible energy starting to get our pantry back in order after the painting process. We found a lot of food that had expired over 2 years ago. It had to be disposed of. Elena also encountered a cylindrical white barrel. It is full of 6- month’s supply of dried foods. It will last for decades. The various cultures that I have been in contact with during my life have had an influence on me. A lot of you know that I have a special place in my heart for Russians, Jewish people, Chinese, And Brasilians. Please allow me to add to that list Mormons. Yes, they are politically-conservative. Yes, they have strong religious beliefs. They do not try to force their beliefs or political ideology on others. They are genuinely nice people. Their religion has endured oppression and harassment by those in authority. They know what hard times are about. They also believe in protecting their family from hard times. They keep a six-month supply of food in their homes or apartments. This is not literally food that we use every day. It is dehydrated or deeply-frozen food. I agree with this mindset. A book that profoundly influenced my life is Harrison Salisbury's The 900 Days. It is about the Nazi/Finnish siege of the city of Leningrad during World War II. It has several disturbing chapters describing in intricate detail people suffering from and dying from starvation. The author also talks about cannibalism.

     Elena made one insightful comment about the ugly white cylinder as follows:

"If we ever have to open that barrel, society as we know it will be gone."

Sunday, May 30, 2021

Some New And Amazing Revelations About Watergate

 https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/2021-05-27/six-things-you-didnt-know-about-watergate?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b3861343-662e-41f8-9edc-c227de0e1025

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

What If The US Had Won The War of 1912 And Annexed Canada?

 From your Digest

I have already answered a question like this, but now that I have more knowledge on this subject, I will answer this question again with a more factual approach.

Original answer: Titus Waddimba's answer to What might have happened if the US had won the War of 1812? (thanks for 50k views and 800+ upvotes btw).


Note: This had little chance of happening.

In order to make this scenario work, I am just going to naively assume that the following factors result in a British defeat for whatever reason.

  • Issac Brock, the man most responsible for preparing Upper Canada for a war with the USA catches a disease and dies.
  • In April 1813, the USA sticks to the original plan and attacks Kingston, which was a much more strategically vital target.
  • In May 1813, after the capture of Fort George, the Americans pursue the retreating British, preventing the British counterattack at the Battle of Stoney Creek, resulting in Upper Canada being essentially defenseless.
  • Britain is more war-weary after the Napoleonic Wars, and sees Canada as a lost cause, and agrees to a peace treaty on unfavorable terms.

So, after all of the following circumstances, Britain agrees to peace. This alternate Treaty of Ghent results in Rupert’s Land, Upper Canada (Ontario), and Lower Canada (Quebec) being ceded to the United States. Britain would retain the Maritime Provinces and Newfoundland, due to their superior navy.

Canada wouldn’t like the idea of being absorbed into the U.S. at all. Most of Canada’s population were loyalists who had fled from the 13 Colonies during the American Revolution. For the first few years following the War of 1812, there would be an insurgency in the Canadas (Quebec especially). Gradually, the insurgency would die down (but for Quebec, it would take much longer).

North America: 1830

By 1837, Ontario would have assimilated into the U.S. (mostly due to the mass migration of New Englanders into the Canadas), but Quebec would prove to be the biggest can of worms. Quebec is majority French-Speaking and is far less culturally homogenous with the USA than Ontario is. This would result in Quebec still rebelling in 1837. Britain would intervene to aid the Quebec rebels and reconquer Canada.

As shown in the Crimean War, Britain was terrible at amphibious landings, due to that and the Americans having more troops (on their home soil), the Americans would win this “War of 1837”, and that would result in the Maritimes being absorbed into the United States as well. It is possible that the British still retain Newfoundland at least because again, superior naval power.

During the early 19th Century, there was a very delicate balance between Free and Slave states in America (free states having Slavery illegal, while slave states having slavery legal). The land from Canada would cause a huge imbalance of power in favor of the free states, so the Missouri Compromise line would be negotiated further north, and the South would need more land for slave states. This would result in Texas being annexed much earlier (likely immediately after the War of 1837), and the Mexican-American War. The United States would still win, but in this world, they would take a far larger chunk of Northern Mexico and annex the Yucatan.

North America: 1845

If the Slave and Free states aren’t balanced by this point, then the U.S. would have more imperialistic adventures in the Caribbean than in our world. The South wanted to expand Southward for more space for plantations and tried to conquer parts of Central America. The North didn’t approve of this at all, but in this world, the North would let *some* of their ambitions slide to finally restore balance.

North America: 1859

North America: 1861 (American Civil War)

Just like its northern counterpart, the Confederacy would be larger in this timeline, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the Gulf of California. Due to the Americans owning territory on both sides of Mexico, a war with France is more likely in this timeline (since they were trying to invade and colonize Mexico).

The Civil War would have the same result (but would last a few months longer). The North would win, the CSA would be dissolved, etc. After the war, the USA would still purchase Alaska from Russia (since Russia was broke after the Crimean War), and may even purchase Greenland and Iceland, too. William Seward, the same Secretary of State who purchased Alaska, wanted to purchase Greenland and Iceland as well. With ownership of Canada, this would be more geographically feasible.

A more imperialistic the United States may have ended up annexing Cuba in 1898 or 1902.

North America: 1914

The rest of history is almost exactly the same (although Britain would be more disadvantaged in both world wars). Quebec would essentially be another Louisiana, eventually become majority English speaking as newer generations of Americans would move in from New England, becoming the majority. The USA would never get involved in Panama and would build the canal in Nicaragua instead.

The USA would have a significantly higher Spanish and Latino population, so there would be debates on if Spanish should be an official language (due to more land being taken from Mexico, annexation of Cuba, etc).

Feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong. Have a nice day.

Logevity Among Humans Is Still Alive And Well!!

 

        Longevity is on my mind this morning. Despite all the coronavirus deaths and talks about a shorter life span and declining populations, many strong people are living much longer. My neighbor across the street will celebrate 90 years of life this Monday. A dear swimming friend has a mother who will celebrate "the big 100" early next week. One of our readers, Sara, had a mother-in-law who was with us between 101 and 104 years of age. (In times long ago, births were not recorded formally as they are now in many parts of the world. The family Bible or other religious book was used to record births. 

      My dear grandmother Sarah Elizabeth passed away in the early 1990s at either 101 years of age or 103 years of age, depending on what family Bible you trusted.) Sara's mother had an incredible life. Let us say that during World War II she was "on the run" from the Nazis. She went to Israel after the war. As we all know, that can be a dangerous place from time to time. She earned a special place in the hearts of Elena and I due to her love of Argentine telenovelas (soap operas.)

Monday, May 24, 2021

Could The US Have Won World War II Without Soviet Help?

 

It is unlikely that the USA would have been willing to accept the huge burden in cash and lives needed to defeat the Nazis without Soviet help.

The USA lost 419,400 dead, 0.32% of their population. And that was a war that was clearly being won after the first few difficult months. Britain lost 450,900, 0.94%, not counting the Empire. Finland lost 2.62% after a series of changes of alignment that did save them as an independent state. Austria lost 5.56%. Germany (1937 borders) lost 8.23%. The Soviet Union lost 13.7%: 10 million military and another 16 million from Nazi massacres and abuse. (Who Gave Victory in World War Two?)

Films show mostly the Western side. So as memories fade, falsehoods are believed.

Extra, 20th January 2021

The best measure is where most of the German army was killed or captured.

It was overwhelmingly on the Eastern Front:

German casualties in World War II - Wikipedia

But people have been persuaded otherwise.

Monday, May 17, 2021

UFOs-A Probable Explanation

 Madame President:

     Your morning briefing...since I was a little child, I have been fascinated by Unidentified Flying Objects or Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon. Last night the news program 60 Minutes had a segment on something that happened in November of 2004.  A US Navy carrier strike group with the USS Nimitz had a strange encounter with UAPs. Here is a video that explains what happened:

   The US government admitted that they are investigating this matter and taking it seriously.
    Are we alone in the universe? I think not. Have we been visited by aliens from other stars? Anything is possible. When one considers interstellar flight, the term "the tyranny of distance" comes into play. A civilization would need technology for a spacecraft that could maintain the speed of light (186,000 miles per second) for up to decades. Just providing the fuel for such propulsion is a mind-boggling task. If this spacecraft going this fast needs to slow down, it would take a massive amount of distance. If you have living beings on board these spacecraft, imagine the life support and biomedical challenges.
     There are many stories about US presidents starting their term and asking for secret documents about UFOs. One story was that they were denied access to these files because it was "above their security clearance level." Former President Obama was asked about UFOs. He smiled and said that this was classified information that he could not discuss.
    I got intrigued. I contacted a friend of mine who holds a PHD from The California Institute of Technology in astronomy. He works at the SETI Institute (search for extraterrestrial intelligence.) I posed a question to Seth about President Obama's interview. He gave me a practical and down to earth answer. The US government was very sensitive about the prospect of other nations (primarily Russia and China) having very advanced technology that we did not have. The Nimitz incident could be another nation showing off its advanced capabilities.
Be careful out there!
Stay "Far from the maddening crowd."
Amo-a,
-JackW
--

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

A Letter To A Dear Jewish Friend Concerning What Is Happening In Israel Now

 Dear Sara:

       I often hear the word Apartheid applied to Israel. I do not appreciate this. During 1981 and from 1990 to April of 1994 when South Africa had its first all-race election, I lived in a true Apartheid state. It bears no resemblance to Israel today.
       The Palestinians of South Africa were The African National Congress. On any given day, they had a bank balance of $600 million US. They were loved and revered all over the world. (Please compare this to the pariah status of Palestinians in many parts of the world including Iran.) The ANC rarely engaged in violence against civilians, as the Palestinians routinely do.
     The ANC understood that a military victory against the white minority government was not a realistic possibility. They could only win by getting world public opinion on their side.
     When Nelson Mandela was released from prison, he was kind and magnanimous toward his white opponents. He made it clear that the ANC recognized the right of white people to exist and share South Africa with the black majority. He promised a constitution that would protect the rights of all. He delivered on this promise.
    If only the Palestinians would stop being violent and aggressive and start being magnanimous and kind.

Shalom,
-JackW