33 JAG Actors Who Have Passed Away

How Does The Trump Presidency End?

Profile photo for Tomaž Vargazon Tomaž Vargazon · Follow Practicing atheistFeb 17 How do you think Trump's presidency will end? Let me use one of Ramsays’ quotes on this one. If you think this has a happy ending, you haven’t been paying attention There is no good way for the end of the Trump ‘47. The baseline scenario is USA is turned into a hybrid regime, akin to pre-2014 (-ish) Russia: the president and the parliament (Congress and Senate) is fixed and will be won by the Republicans with a majority control every single time, forever. This will be achieved by a combination of cheating, lawsuits and directing the DOJ to start investigations and prosecutions against anyone who is a serious threat to their power. Courts will work to further the power of the Republican party. There will be some genuine political opposition, mainly at mayoral and state level, but they will be locked out from real power at the federal level and hamstrung by courts. No opposition, Democrat or some other party, will ever be able to seriously challenge the Republicans for power. The best-case scenario is hardly any better: the backlash in 2028 election is so massive no amount of cheating is able to hide it and the Democrats manage to cling power back. However they now face the GOP deep state that will hamstring every single change or improvement and work to make the country ungovernable. The country will lurch from crisis to crisis, intermittently experiencing periods of crisis (when Democrats are in power) and active dismantling of beneficial institutions (when Republicans are). This setup is not stable however and it almost certainly ends up as either the baseline or the worst-case scenario below. It’s only marginally possible for sanity to return to right-wing politicis, and only if the GOP splits first. The worst-case scenario is the backlash does give Democrats a clean win, but a combination of cheating, electioneering and lawfare enables the Republicans to cling on to power. Chaos ensues and rips the country apart again. But hey, expensive eggs right? And Haitians eating cats and dogs, that had to be stopped. 267.1K views View 5,344 upvotes View 78 shares 1 of 438 answers

Bill Browder: Trump siding with Putin puts US operatives at risk

LIVE | Actor Gene Hackman Found Dead | Actor Gene Hackman's Kids Interro...

What FBI Found In Gene Hackman’s Mansion Will Leave You Shocked

💥BEN HODGES & JAKE BROE: British Army ENTERS the WAR in Ukraine! US figh...

James Carville: What Just Happened In The Oval Office

5 Breaking Updates in Gene Hackman Death Investigation

Sauna Secrets of Finland: Where the World’s Most Beautiful Women Live | ...

Trump gets into irate screaming match with Zelensky in Oval Office

New details emerge surrounding the death of actor Gene Hackman

UPDATE: Gene Hackman death deemed 'suspicious'

TRUMAN Back at Sea After Collision Repairs

💥British and French FIGHTER JETS to ENTER the war in Ukraine! | Ben Hodg...

Bill Browder: Putin can’t afford to end the war in Ukraine | Superpowers

He Shot Down 4 Japanese Planes On December 7, 1941 and Went On To Great Things

Profile photo for Lyle F. Padilla Lyle F. Padilla · Follow Retired US Army Armor Officer, former USAF F-4 WSOFeb 9 Did any pilots who survived Pearl Harbor continue to fly in combat missions? How did their experiences differ from attacking ships at Pearl Harbor to flying over Japan? I can’t address any Japanese pilots who attacked Pearl Harbor, but the US Army Air Force fighter pilot who shot down the most Japanese planes (four confirmed) over Pearl Harbor and the surrounding area on December 7, 1941, 2nd Lieutenant George S. Welch, went on to have a distinguished combat record during the remainder of World War II and then as a test pilot in the postwar era. Welch remained at his base at Wheeler Field in Hawaii for several months after Pearl Harbor before transferring to another squadron during the New Guinea Campaign and started scoring more kills on the first anniversary of Pearl Harbor, then accumulated a total of 16 kills (including the four at Pearl Harbor) over the next ten months. He was then pulled out of combat flying and released from Active Duty to the Air Forces Reserve at the rank of major after contracting malaria, but was hired as a test pilot for North American Aviation and resumed flying in that capacity. He was the chief test pilot for North American’s P-82 Twin Mustang, then the swept-wing jet P-86 Sabre. He is believed to have actually broken the sound barrier in the prototype P-86 two weeks before Chuck Yeager was credited for doing so in a the Bell XS-1 rocket plane in October 1947, with the Air Force keeping quiet about it for several decades as it did not want to reveal the fact that their newest fighter, soon redesignated the F-86 and about to dominate the skies in the Korean War, had a supersonic capability. Welch made several trips to the front line air bases in Korea as a technical representative of North American, and it is believed that he flew a number of missions over “MiG Alley” in North Korea and scored additional kills over communist MiG-15s which were kept off the books and credited to other pilots because of his civilian official status. Welch then became the chief test pilot for the North American F-100 Super Sabre, a larger and more powered engine derivative of the F-86 which was the first production fighter to go supersonic in level flight. Sadly, he was killed in 1954 testing an F-100 which had stability problems. 32.6K views View 445 upvotes View 5 shares 1 of 5 answers

How The Finns Beat The Russians 1939-1940

Profile photo for Catalin Olteanu Catalin Olteanu Former Small Entrepreneur 4y Why did the USSR, with superior military size and strength, suffer such losses in the Winter War against Finland? Can anybody imagine how it is possible to conduct a military assault on average temperature of -21 to -24 degrees Celsius? Can anybody imagine how enthusiastic can be a soldier sleeping in a tent at -30 or even -39 degrees Celsius, especially when on the next day he is supposed to attack one of the most fortified defensive lines in the history of warfare? What if the attack is to be led under such circumstances that snow can reach 1.5 meters ? Or what if beneath the snow there are mines, swamps and marshes ? The ‘’Winter War’’ was a political action designed to impress the world-Germany too- about the major technological advance of the Red Army. The attack would have been an incredibly difficult task even in the summer time. This is the great general who saved Finland -Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim - Wikipedia and this is his main opponent : Kirill Meretskov - Wikipedia Geographically speaking, Finland is arranged such that any aggression could come only from the Soviet Union, and only through the Karelian Isthmus.The Finnish army, began an extensive buildup of defenses on the Karelian Isthmus since 1918. Beginning 1929, the scope of the buildup expanded significantly. On the Karelian Isthmus emerged a solid strip of fortifications and obstructions, which became known as the Mannerheim Line. Finland spent practically all of her military budget for ten years on the fortifications. The main strike was carried out on the Karelian Isthmus; secondary strikes were carried out along the entire Finnish-Soviet border, from the Baltic Sea to the Barents Sea. The Mannerheim Line was not located on the immediate border, but deeper in the territory. The line was in fact a brilliantly camouflaged defense structure, well integrated into the surroundings, and stretching 135 km in width and up to 30 km in depth. Its right flank met the shore of the Baltic Sea; its left flank bordered Lake Ladoga. All in all, the Mannerheim Line counted 2,311 concrete, ironclad, and wooden defense structures. All existing bridges on this strip were wired with explosives and ready to be blown up or burned. The Finns used a brilliant tactic. A couple of snipers could block a whole Red Army division. The Finnish snipers and light mobile squads were fully active and operating to the best of their capacity. Here is a standard situation: a column of Soviet tanks, motorized infantry, and artillery is moving along a forest road. To their left and to their right there is nowhere to go—impassable woods, packed with land mines. Ahead of them was a bridge. The Soviet demolition experts checked for mines and came back reporting that the way was clear. The first tanks begin to crawl onto the bridge—and together with the bridge they fly up into the air: packs of dynamite had been inserted into the supporting beams of the bridge during its construction; they are undetectable, and even if they had been discovered, any attempt to defuse them would have triggered an explosion. The Soviet column, many kilometers in length, like a snake is stopped in its path. Now, the Finnish snipers spring into action. The snipers strike from somewhere far away. They hit only Red Army officers and tow-truck drivers. A diversion through the forest is not an option-on both sides of the road lie impenetrable minefields. Below probably the best sniper in history : Simo Häyhä - Wikipedia Not a single army in the world had conducted an offensive operation, under a temperature of minus 20 degrees Celsius. In such temperatures, no one had even attempted to conduct massive attacks, because it is impossible. The Red Army’s attack was an exception. Finnish soldiers are born, raised, and trained to act in these conditions. The snipers who spent days waiting for their victims, and the soldiers of the light ski squads which raided the rear of the Red Army, were warmly clad and well equipped. They had clear orders and retreat path to shelters and bunkers. The theater of operations consisted of 50 percent woodlands, 25 percent water, some swampland, and only about 10 percent of the total surface could be crossed by tanks. During the 105 days of the war, there were twenty-five days of flying weather. The rest of the time, blizzards or snowfall impeded flight. In December, there are very few daylight hours. Complete darkness falls at four o’clock. In the north there was no daytime at all. The mighty Soviet artillery was pretty useless due to thick snow; the tanks were useless; the air force also could not help, for it could not see anything. The Finns were most of the time under the snow, well camouflaged. The finish pillboxes were made by professionals: Against the pillbox #0011, the Soviets unleashed 1,322 shells from 203-mm howitzers and 280-mm mortars—almost two hundred tons. The pillbox was partially damaged, but even after this it continued to resist. Despite the incredible resilience of the Finns, the Mannerheim Line was penetrated and the Finland was forced to sue for peace. On March 13, 1940, the war between Finland and the Soviet Union was ended. The war lasted 105 days The Soviet Union received the Karelian Isthmus, but Finland kept her independence. On April 12, 1942, Hitler said the following: “The entire war with Finland in 1940, just as the Russian advance into Poland with obsolete tanks and weapons and poorly clothed soldiers, was nothing other than a grandiose disinformation campaign, because Russia at that time controlled arms which made it, in comparison with Germany and Japan, a world power.” He also said, on June 22, 1942: “Back home in Russia, they created an extremely powerful military industry . . . and the more we find out what goes on in Russia, the more we rejoice that we delivered the decisive blow in time. The Red Army’s weaponry is the best proof that they succeeded in reaching extremely high achievements.” 42.4K views457 upvotes32 shares28 comments 7.5K views View 25 upvotes

State Secrets - Still Classified WWII Subjects

💥British fighter jets to ENTER THE WAR in Ukraine! US Troops to DEFEND t...

Trump Fires "Woke" Pentagon Leaders

Deep Intel on the U.S. Plan to End the War in Ukraine

Deep Intel on the TRUMAN Collision at Sea

Ben Hodges - Europe must Prepare for War or Risk Russian Provocation and...

Why I Left MSNBC

Psychic predictions 2025: completion of the oligarch era & people power ...

Five Special Books That Had A Profound Impact On My Life

In a recent Op-Ed, I praised the author Sonya Walger and her book "Lion." Sonya also has a podcast called "Bookish." In each segment, she interacts with a major film or television star with the same question: "What were the five books that most influenced your life?" She started me thinking. I want to share with you the five books that had a profound influence on me as follows: 1) The Wind Off The Sea by David Beaty; This novel follows a career Royal Air Force officer from 1940 until 1962. My sister and I love the winter days in our hometown of Galveston, Texas, The cold wind blasts in from the Gulf of Mexico. This book has wonderful character development. The reader comes to know the RAF officer so well. The book ends with a murder mystery and an unauthorized attempt to fire a ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead. 2) Once An Eagle by Anton Myrer; this novel covers 50 years in the life of a man named Sam Damon. He comes from the Midwest of the U.S. He joins the U.S. Army. He is sent to fight in France as an enlisted man in World War I. He distinguishes himself in combat. He is given a battlefield commission as a second lieutenant. He hates war but loves the army. He is a leader who is always concerned about his men's welfare. He plans battles carefully to minimize casualties. When the war ends, Sam stays in the army. He goes through 23 years of the peacetime army. When World War II comes, he is sent to lead soldiers in the Pacific island campaigns including the Philippines. He is promoted to general. He is a brilliant infantry officer. When World War II ended, he goes through the peacetime army. He was sent to South Korea in 1950 to lead an infantry division. He becomes quite knowledgeable about combat operations in Asia. He was recalled from retirement to take a tour of South Vietnam in 1968. He sees the madness of this war. He is getting ready to release a report warning the public. Career military officers murder him to keep him silent. The whole theme of the book was "Suffering can deaden the soul or enrich it." 3) The Captain by Jan de Hartog; this novel follows the wartime experiences of a merchant marine captain who routinely made the run from England to Murmansk in the Soviet Union. As you can imagine, the Nazis did everything possible to stop these ships from bringing supplies to Russia. The captain survives the war and attributes it to good luck. 4) Firefox and Firefox Down by Craig Thomas; this novel has a wild premise. The Soviet Union designs an advanced jet fighter that a pilot can control with thoughts. The U.S. sneaks a former U.S. Air Force pilot and Vietnam veteran to steal the plane and bring it back to the West. The pilot is named Mitchell Gant. He steals the Soviet plane and begins the mad dash to the West. The Russians do everything possible to recover their plane or shoot it down. The aerial combat scenes would make a great action/adventure story. The author does a further brilliant job of developing Mitchell Gant as a character. As he rushes to evade the Soviets, he vomits in the cockpit. He has blackouts. He has flashbacks to the trauma of his Vietnam combat missions. He is never sure that he can accomplish this mission. As Firefox Down ends, Mithcell drops the landing gears to land the Soviet fighter in Scotland. I was throwing the book in the air and cheering. It was not because Mitchell had defeated the Russians. It was because he had defeated the dark spirits that lived inside him. 5) The House Of The Spirits by Isabel Allende; this novel tells the story of three generations of Chilean women starting in the early 1900s and ending when General Pinochet stages the military coup in 1973. Having spent decades of my life being married to two South American women, I love this book. It shows what it is really like to be a woman in South America. This book was published 39 years ago. Each time I read the ending, I get tears in my eyes and am emotionally touched. The is a dog with magical capabilities in the book. His name is Barabbas. The book ends with these words: "Barabbas came to us by the sea."

The Economist Magazine Cover For 02-15/2025

The Economist Read in browser February 15th 2025 How we chose this week’s image SUBSCRIBER ONLY Cover Story How we chose this week’s image Insert a clear and simple description of the image Edward Carr Deputy editor We had two covers this week. In America and Asia, as Donald Trump and Elon Musk prepare to take on the Pentagon, we weigh up whether DOGE will reform it or wreck it. In our British and European editions, we feature an interview with Friedrich Merz, who is the clear front-runner to become Germany’s next chancellor. America’s armed forces face a real problem. Not since the Soviet Union launched Sputnik and built huge tank formations at the height of the cold war have America’s military vulnerabilities been so glaring. In the killing fields of Ukraine the United States is being out-innovated by drone designers; in the seas and skies off China’s coast it is losing its ability to deter a blockade or invasion of Taiwan. Our task on the cover was to get across the importance of reform as well as the risks that it descends into chaos or corruption. We start with the latest in our attempts to depict Mr Trump by showing ever smaller parts of his body. A hand will do—though the Pentagon has been reduced to a tiny steel nut. However, although Mr Trump is the immediate reason to write about the Pentagon, we wanted to get across the fact that our coverage is broader than that. Our main focus is the technological, industrial and bureaucratic weakness of America’s defence establishment. That led us to a second, more promising, idea of the Pentagon and the drones. This design doesn’t quite work—we weren’t sure whether this swarm was emerging from the DoD or (more appropriately) attacking it—but, as you will see, it figured in our final cover. The Economist Here we have the Pentagon implanted in a circuit board, in a misty, atmospheric sketch—with a hint of the film “Blade Runner”—and a crystal-clear worked-up final cover. America struggles to turn technology into a military advantage. The drones over Ukraine are upgraded every few weeks, a pace that is beyond the Pentagon’s budgeting process, which takes years. American and European jammers in electronic warfare cost two or three times as much as Ukrainian ones, but are obsolete. The good news is that a new generation of mil-tech firms, including Anduril, Palantir and Shield AI, is banging on the Pentagon’s doors. Indeed, Palantir is now worth more than any of the five big prime contractors, such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Again, however, the Pentagon in this treatment is awfully small. And, although the focus on its problems with technology is justified, they are just symptoms of a deeper malaise. This took us in a different direction. We have the drones, we have DOGE battling the bureaucracy and we have a truly massive Pentagon somewhere in deep space—less “Blade Runner” than “Star Wars”. The space connection makes sense, because NASA shows how to introduce competition, risk-taking and innovation into a procurement system dominated by incumbents. In the 2010s, to escape the ignominy of paying for rides to the International Space Station on Russian spacecraft, NASA put fixed-price contracts out to tender. Boeing offered Starliner; Mr Musk’s SpaceX offered Crew Dragon at a much lower cost. Crew Dragon has been a huge success. Starliner has yet to fly a successful mission. We liked this idea and asked for it to be worked up into a cover. This was almost there. We needed a bit more going on, so we added some drones and explosions and brightened up the background nebulae. We called this the battle for the Pentagon. Mr Trump and his insurgents will be taking on pork-barrelling politicians, as well as the bureaucracy. They guard their control over defence spending so jealously that, without congressional permission, the Pentagon cannot as a rule shift more than $15m from one line to another—too little to buy even four Patriot missiles. And yet it could all go very wrong. If Mr Trump prefers sacking generals for supposedly being “woke” or disloyal, he will bring dysfunction upon the Pentagon. If Mr Musk and his mil-tech brethren use DOGE’s campaign to wreck, or to boost their own power and wealth, they will corrupt it. Their work could not be more important, or more risky. We also published our interview with Friedrich Merz, the Christian Democrat from North Rhine-Westphalia who, after elections later this month, looks very likely to become Germany’s next chancellor. Outside Germany, the beanpole from Brilon is an unfamiliar figure, so we decided to use a photograph from the interview. Mr Merz has a difficult task ahead of him. Germany has been in recession for the past two years. Unhappiness at migration has led to a surge in support for the xenophobic right, fragmenting politics and causing paralysis in government. For years Germany has relied on importing cheap gas from Russia, selling expensive exports to China and outsourcing its security to America. That business model lies in ruins. Here are two standard shots. In our interview Mr Merz came across as confident, intelligent and remarkably calm considering the stakes. His instincts lie in the right direction. He understands the concerns of business and promises a crusade against red tape. He believes in free markets, free trade and the Atlantic alliance. He knows that fixing immigration is crucial to weakening the appeal of Germany’s hard-right party, the Alternative for Germany. These would make fine covers, but they are a bit dull. We wanted to get close up. The frown tells a more accurate story than Mr Merz’s optimistic gaze into the middle distance. Our worry about the next chancellor is that Mr Merz favours what sounds like incremental change over the radical shake-up that Germany and Europe need. He behaves as if the hard part will be to get elected. Yet governing will be much harder. To command his coalition and to carry through difficult reforms in a time of turmoil, he will need a mandate for sweeping change. To capture that tension we zoomed right in on Mr Merz, who is looking straight into the camera. Some Germans may see this as a harsh portrait. In fact it dramatises the man and the hard road that lies ahead of him. Cover image • View large image (“Battle for the Pentagon”) • View large image (“Can Friedrich Merz save Germany?”) Related stories → Will Donald Trump and Elon Musk wreck or reform the Pentagon? (Leader)

Will Donald Trump And Elon Musk Wreck Or Reform The Pentagon?

Leaders | High alert Will Donald Trump and Elon Musk wreck or reform the Pentagon? America’s security depends upon their success The Pentagon as a space station in a battle of drones and military aircraft image: Mona Eing & Michael Meissner Leaders February 15th 2025 Will Donald Trump and Elon Musk wreck or reform the Pentagon? Can Friedrich Merz save Germany—and Europe? After DeepSeek, America and the EU are getting AI wrong Countering China’s diplomatic coup The Lucy Letby case shows systemic failure and a national malaise Feb 13th 2025 Save Share Give Listen to this story. IN THE PENTAGON they must surely be on high alert. On February 9th President Donald Trump declared that it would soon become the target for Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Accusing it of “hundreds of billions of fraud and abuse”, Mr Trump will unleash his insurgents, fresh from feeding foreign aid into the woodchipper. Their work could not be more important, or more risky. That is because America’s armed forces face a real problem. Not since the Soviet Union launched Sputnik and built huge tank formations at the height of the cold war have America’s military vulnerabilities been so glaring. In the killing fields of Ukraine America is being out-innovated by drone designers; in the seas and skies off China it is losing its ability to deter a blockade or invasion of Taiwan. America’s military supremacy is in jeopardy The stakes are all the higher because the Pentagon is a place where MAGA ideology meets reality. Mr Trump’s foreign policy is transactional: this week he said he had begun talks with Russia on the future of Ukraine. But it is built on the idea that peace comes through strength, and that is possible only if America’s forces pose a credible threat. And what if DOGE goes rogue in the Pentagon? If Mr Musk causes chaos or corrupts procurement, the consequences for America’s security could be catastrophic. The problems are clearest in the struggle to turn technology into a military advantage. The drones over Ukraine are upgraded every few weeks, a pace that is beyond the Pentagon’s budgeting process, which takes years. American and European jammers in electronic warfare cost two or three times as much as Ukrainian ones, but are obsolete. Many big American drones have been useless in Ukraine; newer ones are pricier than Ukrainian models. Another problem is that America’s defence industry has been captured. At the end of the cold war the country had 51 prime contractors and only 6% of defence spending went to firms that specialised in defence. Today, just five primes soak up 86% of the Pentagon’s cash. Wary of driving more primes out of business, the department has opted for a risk-averse culture. Contracts are typically cost-plus, rewarding lateness and overspending. The resulting lack of productivity gains helps explain why building warships in America costs so much more than it does in Japan or South Korea. Behind this is the nightmare of budgets. Two-year delays are aggravated by congressional squabbling. Pork-barrelling politicians waste money by vetoing the end of programmes. They guard their control over spending so jealously that, without congressional permission, the Pentagon cannot as a rule shift more than $15m from one line to another—too little to buy even four Patriot missiles. When the Pentagon proposed diverting just 0.5% of the defence budget to buy thousands of drones under its “Replicator” initiative in August 2023, winning approval took almost 40 congressional meetings. Pentagon angst is as old as the military-industrial complex. Past secretaries of defence, including Bob Gates and the late Ash Carter, were philosopher kings next to their new and manifestly unqualified successor, Pete Hegseth. And yet the defence bureaucracy has always seemed to come out on top. There are two reasons why this moment may be different. One is that the time is ripe. Not only is the threat to American security becoming clear, but a new generation of mil-tech firms, including Anduril, Palantir and Shield AI, is banging on the Pentagon’s doors. Indeed, Palantir is now worth more than any of the five prime contractors. More controversially, Mr Musk is eager to crack heads together, an enthusiasm which stems partly from the second reason to hope: his experience elsewhere. In the 2010s, to escape the ignominy of paying for rides to the International Space Station on Russian spacecraft, NASA put fixed-price contracts to provide such services out to tender. Boeing offered something called Starliner; Mr Musk’s SpaceX offered Crew Dragon at a much lower cost. Crew Dragon has been a huge success. Starliner has yet to fly a successful mission (and has left Boeing having to absorb billions of dollars of budget overruns). From 1960 to 2010 the cost of getting a kilogram into orbit hovered at around $12,000; SpaceX rockets have already cut that by a factor of ten, and promise much more. Helsing, Europe’s only defence unicorn, takes a similarly nimble approach to development, continually updating its systems with data from the front lines. Mr Musk’s task is big and complex. American weapons need more AI, autonomy and lower costs. Where possible, they should be made from cheap off-the-shelf parts that ride on advances in consumer tech. The Pentagon should foster competition and risk-taking, knowing that some schemes will fail. A decade ago Carter set up a unit for innovation, but it was often seen as a threat. The Pentagon needs more of them. It should also listen to combatant commanders, too often drowned out by politics. Hardest of all, Mr Trump will have to get congressional Republicans to give the Pentagon a freer rein to spend and innovate. Reforming the Pentagon is much harder than other parts of government. America cannot focus on preparing for war in 2035 if that involves lowering its defences today. It cannot simply replace multi-billion-dollar submarines and bomber squadrons with swarms of drones, because to project power to the other side of the world will continue to require big platforms. Instead America needs a Department of Defence that can revolutionise the economics of massive systems and accelerate the spread of novel systems at the same time. Mr Musk and his boss are conflicted. If Mr Trump prefers sacking generals for supposedly being “woke” or disloyal, he will bring dysfunction upon the Pentagon. If Mr Musk and his mil-tech brethren use DOGE’s campaign to wreck, or to boost their own power and wealth, they will corrupt it. Those temptations make it hard to think that this administration will succeed where others have failed. But the hope is that they will. America’s security depends upon it. ■ For subscribers only: to see how we design each week’s cover, sign up to our weekly Cover Story newsletter.

If We Want To See How The Russia/Ukraine War Ends, We need To Look At The Historical Parallel of Finland vs The Soviet Union 1939-1946

There was the announcement that President Trump is now opening negotiations with Vladimir Putin to end the three-year war in Ukraine. Elena got upset about this. She asked an excellent question: "Why haven't the Europeans been brought into the process? After all, this is a European war." I suspect that ending this war will be a process just as painful as ending the Vietnam. When the dust settles, Ukraine will lose some territory. It will be a neutral state. Membership in NATO is "off the table." Membership in the European Union is very possible. There is always the argument that Russia will use this time to rebuild its economy and military machine. Then will come a second Ukraine invasion. In the time of peace Ukraine will be rebuilding its economy and military machine that will be very modern with the best weapons in the world. I pointed out to Elena a fascinating point of history. I am a World War II amateur scholar specializing in Russia and the Eastern Front. Josef Stalin launched an invasion of Finland in 1939. Here is a summary of what happened: The Soviet Union invaded Finland on November 30, 1939, beginning the Winter War. The war lasted until March 13, 1940. How it started • The Soviet Union demanded that Finland cede land to create a buffer zone against Nazi Germany. • Finland rejected the demands, which led to the invasion. • The Soviet Union's forces included 465,000 men and 1,000 aircraft. How it was fought • The war was fought in brutal conditions, with heroic actions on both sides. • The Finns used guerrilla fighters, reindeer to haul supplies, and single-handed attacks on tanks. • The Soviets suffered heavy losses. How it ended • Finland had to surrender a large area of southeastern Finland, including the city of Viipuri. • Finland also leased the peninsula of Hanko to the Soviet Union for 30 years. Aftermath • The League of Nations denounced the invasion and expelled the Soviet Union. • President Roosevelt gave Finland $10 million in credit. The brave people of Finland fought this invading force with primitive weapons including Molotov cocktails (bottles full of gasoline with a rag in the top of the bottle that was lit and thrown at Russian tanks.) Stalin's forces suffered horrific losses. When the Nazis invaded Russia, Finland came in on the Nazi side. They played a big part in the 900-day siege of Leningrad. Soviet forces drove out the finish military contingent. After World War II, Josef Stalin took over all of Eastern Europe. He did not make a move to Finland. Here is the official explanation: Stalin did not invade Finland at the end of World War II because, despite having the military power to do so, he deemed it strategically unnecessary to antagonize the country further, considering Finland had already ceded significant territory to the Soviet Union during the Winter War and had largely aligned itself with the Allied powers by the war's end, preventing them from becoming a potential threat to the Soviet Union; additionally, a full invasion would have been costly in terms of lives and resources, which were needed for post-war reconstruction. In my humble opinion, Finland caused the Soviet Union such awful losses that Stalin had not the stomach for a repeat of the first Finnish invasion. I think that Putin will adopt the same attitude toward Ukraine.

Shocking New Video From the Israeli F-15 Beirut Bunker Buster Strike

Me 264 Amerikabomber: Hitler's Secret Plan To Attack New York

The Plane that Was Too Creepy For Hitler

Trump's First Airstrike Wipes Out ISIS Mastermind in Somalia

The Economist Magazine Cover For 02/08/2025 Beware Of Online Scams!

The Economist Read in browser February 8th 2025 How we chose this week’s image SUBSCRIBER ONLY Cover Story How we chose this week’s image The Economist Edward Carr Deputy editor We were keen to step back from the headlines this week. Since making landfall on January 20th, Storm Donald has battered the news cycle with hurricane-force bombast and a multi-vortex tornado of executive orders. We covered the tempest once again in this issue, reporting on the turmoil over tariffs and Gaza. But for our cover we chose to focus on people who are as bent on remaining anonymous as the Oval Office Aeolus is determined to be at the eye of it all. I am talking about scammers. Online fraud is a sophisticated industry that steals over $500bn a year from victims all around the world. It employs perhaps 1.5m people. In “Scam Inc”, our eight-part podcast series released this week, we describe the crime, the criminals and the untold suffering they cause. Scamming already rivals the global drugs trade, but it is growing much faster. It is the most significant change in transnational organised crime in decades. Our coverage draws on months of reporting by Sue-Lin Wong, our South-East Asia correspondent, and Sam Colbert, one of our producers. Our thought for the cover was to adapt the artwork for the podcast. Here are a couple of ideas that we used for the podcast. The first episode of “Scam Inc” tells the story of Shan Hanes, the chief executive of a bank in rural Kansas, who was manipulated into investing $47m in crypto, most of it other people’s money. He was in the thrall of a woman called Bella, whom he had met on LinkedIn. A part-time pastor, he also stole from his church. Even after the bank failed and his life had fallen apart, Mr Hanes could not believe that he had been duped. He flew to Australia in the hope that Bella would help get the money back. She never turned up. Unfortunately, neither of these designs capture the enormity of such a crime. Mr Hanes was the victim of what is known as “pig-butchering”. In the original Chinese that is known as 杀猪盘, or sha zhu pan, criminal slang for a technique in which scammers identify a mark, win their confidence over weeks or months, get them to invest and then mercilessly squeeze “every last drop of juice” from them, their family and friends. This design takes that idea literally—so much so that unless you are already familiar with it, you may be baffled. The Economist Here we have combined innovative tech, butchering and the crooks’ raid on people’s savings by depicting a piggy bank and a cyber-hammer. The Chinese criminal syndicates run a digital gig economy. Rather than being hierarchical mafias, they form an underground network that is scalable and hard to stop. One group may specialise in contacting marks, another in coaching them to invest in crypto and a third in laundering their stolen money. All of this takes place online. Once again, though, unless you know that the hammer is supposed to be digital, it is a bit confusing. This gets at the idea of an out-of-reach, upside-down world of lawless syndicates and broken lives. Pig-butchers work from compounds that host production lines of scammers, some of whom are trafficked and held there as forced labour. The compounds contain supermarkets, brothels and gambling dens—as well as torture chambers for workers who cause trouble. They are a cross between a prison camp and a company town. Some of the profits buy protection from politicians and officials. In the Philippines a Chinese national called Alice Guo became the mayor of a small, run-down town, where she built a scamming complex. In 2019-24 over $400m passed through her bank accounts. In Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar cybercrime is a mainstay of the economy. Scam states are likely to become even harder to deal with than narco states. As so often, simplicity won the day. The barbed hook is an allusion to the fact that everyone becomes a potential target of the scammers simply by going about their lives. The scammers manipulate their targets by preying on their emotions, not only by feigning romance, but by exploiting all human frailties: fear, loneliness, greed, grief and boredom. Among the victims we have identified are the relatives of the very FBI investigators whose job is to shut scams down. This is where that design took us. The drawing has more life than a photomontage. A subtitle advertised how much reporting had gone into our work. Unfortunately, just now everything seems to favour the scammers. Advanced malware helps them harvest sensitive data from victims’ devices. Online marketplaces supply them with tools and services, including web domains and AI software. By combining voice-changing and face-changing AI with translation services and torrents of stolen data sold on underground markets, the scammers will be able to target more victims in more places. The Trump tornado is far from blowing itself out. Doubtless, we will feature it on our cover before long. But another storm is raging in the shadows online, and many of us are barely aware of it. Finally, many thanks to all of you who entered a design for our cover competition. It is a festival of creativity. We will send out the shortlist of our seven favourite ideas in a special Cover Story newsletter next week. You will have a chance to vote on your pick; and then I will announce the winners. Cover image • View large image (“Scam Inc”) Backing stories → The vast and sophisticated global enterprise that is Scam Inc (Leader) → Online scams may already be as big a scourge as illegal drugs (Briefing) → Scam Inc: our eight-part podcast series investigating the sinister world of online fraud

The Controversial Nude Scene that BANNED The Last Picture Show

This Congressman Wants to Kill the Ford Class Aircraft Carrier

Putin fears assassination as Ukraine takes out key Kremlin figures

Expert identifies 'doomsday scenario' with Trump that attorneys are worr...

Putin under threat as Russia foresees inevitable failure in Ukraine | Am...

‘Prigozhin-type’ assassination takes out Putin's 'death squad' chief and...

New Intel Reveals Massive Chinese "Doomsday" Command

Massive AIRSTRIKE! Ukraine HITS Russia's Most Famous Oil Plant! Putin is...

Did The Russian GRU Bring Down The Lear Jet In Philadelphia on Friday?

The First Sunday in February Is Here: As always, my radar is on a 360-degree sweep, looking for things that normal media outlets miss. I was in my study early Friday evening. News Nation delivered a shocking report that was most disturbing. A Lear Jet had lifted off from The Executive Airport in North Philadelphia. As it climbed, the pilot lost control. The jet crashed into an open field. A huge explosion followed. As more details came out, it was revealed that the aircraft was an older Lear Jet. It was carrying Mexican citizens on an emergency medivac flight that would stop in Missouri and proceed to Tijuana. Most likely, oxygen bottles were on the plane to support the deathly ill patient. Initial speculation was that a spark ignited the oxygen bottles, causing an explosion. The National Traffic Safety Bureau will spend months doing a detailed investigation before official findings are released. I went to full alert. The Ukraine war has disrupted conventional military thinking. A couple of unsophisticated drones can sink a major capital vessel of the Russian Navy. One hundred grams of explosives on a bicycle seat can kill two very senior and heavily guarded Russian generals. Putin's GRU has shown that a tiny explosive charge strategically placed can bring down a large jet airliner. His GRU targeted DHL cargo jets. A small explosive device was planted in innocuous packages. In 4 of the 5 cases, the explosive devices were detected and removed from the plane's cargo. In the fifth case, an explosive device was not detected. It detonated in midair. A major jet airliner was brought down. Vladimir Putin is taking savage losses in Ukraine and on Russian territory occupied by Ukrainian forces. Donald Trump was expected to cease all aid to Ukraine when he came into office and force an end to the war. Things have not gone according to Putin's hopes. He may have ordered the GRU to cause a plane crash on US soil as a warning to Trump. The Executive Airport in North Philadelphia was a perfect venue for such an attack. It did not have the security that the excellent Philadelphia International Airport has. GRU planners would have become aware of the medivac flight. A tiny explosive device was planted on the plane. The plan was to detonate it on liftoff. The goal was to have the plane heavily loaded with fuel crash at the nearby major shopping mall or a large concentration of row houses with devastating property damage and civilian casualties as the massive amount of jet fuel caught fire and rapidly spread. Luckily the plane crashed in an open field. Give thanks to your higher power for your good fortune in life. -JackW

The Economist Magazine Cover For 02/01/2025

Cover Story: The revolt against regulation Inbox The Economist Unsubscribe 10:04 AM (3 hours ago) to me The Economist Read in browser February 1st 2025 How we chose this week’s image SUBSCRIBER ONLY Cover Story How we chose this week’s image The Economist If you think you have what it takes to design an Economist cover, enter our competition by February 3rd. You’ll be in with a chance of winning a copy of our new Cover Story annual, which assembles our covers of 2024 week by week. Edward Carr Deputy editor This was another week when the Trumpian news cycle imposed itself on our choice of cover—not on what we wanted to write about, but on how we illustrated it. I suspect that the remaining 206 weeks of this presidency will see plenty more covers go the same way. Our theme was slashing red tape and it is a heroic one. Javier Milei has wielded a chainsaw against Argentine regulations. Narendra Modi’s advisers are quietly confronting India’s triplicate-loving babus. Rachel Reeves, Britain’s chancellor, wants to overhaul planning rules and expand London’s Heathrow Airport. Even Vietnam’s Communists have a scheme to shrink the bureaucracy. Done right, the anti-red-tape revolution could usher in faster economic growth, lower prices and new technology. Here is where that thought leads. We have Eugène Delacroix’s painting that commemorates the revolution of 1830 in which Liberty dispatched the reviled Charles X. In our version she is brandishing a sharp pair of scissors, ready to dispatch an equally pernicious web of red tape. Some of us thought that it was odd to evoke revolutionary France in order to illustrate a theme that has often been championed by the right. However, politicians on the left have realised that, with high interest rates and towering public debt, rapid growth is the only way to make welfare states affordable. Besides, the reason to cut rules is not just to enhance enterprise, but freedom, too. We liked this, but then along came Mr Trump’s sledgehammer executive orders—some of them weakened and rescinded within days. Because the president risks making deregulation seem reckless, our heroic imagery would not work. One alternative was the world swathed in red tape. It has the virtue of being accurate. Americans spend a total of 12bn hours a year complying with federal rules. The federal code runs to 180,000 pages, up from 20,000 in the 1960s. In the past five years the European Parliament has enacted more than twice as many laws as America. In Britain, well-meaning rules propounded by newt-fanciers obstruct, delay and raise the cost of new infrastructure. But we use a lot of globes and this one lacks drama. The Economist These two are better at getting across the scale of the problem. In much of the rich world getting anything built has become a daunting task, keeping house prices high. Highway projects suffer cost overruns and delays. Proposals to dig mines in America endure nearly a decade in permitting hell. Over-regulation most hurts small businesses, deterring newcomers. Incumbents sit back, knowing that they are sheltered. These ideas are downbeat. The figure lost in the forest has a chainsaw, but it is a lonely and forbidding place. We wanted to be more enthusiastic. You need only look at history to see that deregulation can pep up the animal spirits. Margaret Thatcher’s Britain, India in the early 1990s and southern Europe in the 2020s all sped ahead after their leaders undertook pro-market reforms. Under Mr Milei, Argentina is growing again; deregulation has brought the prices of some imports down by fully 35%. The marching scissors certainly convey efficacy. But they also have an unfortunate overtone of militarism. This is a portrayal in which the thickets of bureaucracy are being cut back by an overmighty state. That paradox is confusing. This paradox, by contrast, is amusing. The scissors are stuck to the wall by the very same red tape they are supposed to cut. It is a nod to the reality that reforms are often stymied by incumbent businesses, trade unions or lobby groups who stand to lose from deregulation, even if society as a whole will benefit. Our designers liked this image because it echoes the “Comedian”, an installation by Maurizio Cattelan that sold at auction for $6.2m in November. The editorial team was less sure, though. Even if you already know the story of this concave comestible, it is hard to work out what is going on. This was the idea that held our attention. Rules and government are essential in any society. Without them, and the bureaucrats to enforce them, life would be shorter and less secure. But this cover shows how the rules can proliferate until they are suffocating business and society. For the final design, we overlaid our masthead with the sticky stuff, we got rid of the words “red tape”—you don’t want to repeat the visual metaphor—and we made the tape itself into such a tangled mess that you are just itching to peel it back. A bit like all that bureaucracy. Cover image • View large image (“The revolt against regulation”) Backing stories → Milei, Modi, Trump: an anti-red-tape revolution is under way (Leader) → Many governments talk about cutting regulation but few manage to (Briefing) → Even in India, bureaucracy is being curtailed (Briefing) → Javier Milei, free-market revolutionary (The Americas)

Military Helo Pilot Gives Possible Cause for DCA Midair

Update from Ukraine | Breaking News: Ukraine Strikes one of the biggest ...

Julianna V.: Secret Agent | Pascale Hutton | Full Movie (Intelligence)

Casablanca | An Unlikely Classic: Behind The Scenes | Warner Bros. Enter...

Deleted Scene From ''Casablanca'' No-one Was Supposed To See

Trump's First Week-THe Real Truth

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Trump's first week: The Real Story Let it be known Robert Reich Jan 26 READ IN APP Friends, Before I post my Sunday cartoon I want to share with you some thoughts about the first week of Trump II. The New York Times describes Trump as leading “a global wave of hard-line conservative populism.” Rubbish. What’s Trump is undertaking has nothing whatever to do with conservatism, which is about conserving institutions and shrinking the size of government. And it has nothing to do with populism, which is about confronting elites. Trump is leading a move to replace democracy with oligarchy. He’s implementing a plan to make the wealthiest people in America far wealthier and more powerful, including Trump himself, and to turn American democracy into a giant corporation run by a handful of absurdly rich men. He thinks he can accomplish this by getting the rest of us so angry at one another — over immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, abortion, diversity, and the like — that we don’t look upward and see where most of the wealth and power have gone. Trump’s divisive policies will cause great harm, to be sure, and we must do everything we can to protect those who are vulnerable to them. But his cruel divisiveness is deflecting attention from the main event. The media reported on all the hot-buttons Trump pushed: The government now recognizes only two “immutable” genders, male and female. Migrants (now referred to as “aliens”) are being turned away at the border. Immigration agents are freed to target hospitals, schools, and churches in search of people to deport. Diversity efforts in the federal government have been dismantled and employees turned into snitches. Federal money will be barred from paying for many abortions. All awful to be sure, but the bigger story is Trump’s consolidation of power — substituting loyalists for experts across the government, using retribution to intimidate others, purging the government’s independent inspectors general, giving the Defense Department more authority over civilian life (and putting a raving loyalist in charge), giving Elon Musk authority to cut spending and roll back regulations, and readying a massive tax cut for the wealthy and big corporations. Americans aren’t seeing this big story yet because Trump’s divisiveness is masking it. One example: Trump fired Lina Khan, the aggressive monopoly-buster chair of the Federal Trade Commission, and replaced her with corporate stooge Andrew Ferguson. As a result, giant corporations and their CEOs are now free to get even bigger — merging with one another, acquiring smaller companies, and using predatory bullying to wipe out competitors. These are key steps on the road toward even more concentrated oligarchic control. Yet what’s been reported this week is that Ferguson is purging diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies from the Federal Trade Commission. I’m not playing down the importance of DEI. I’m just saying that the really big shift is happening behind the rightward flip. In fact, the terms “left” and “right” mean less and less now. The big story is about power and wealth moving into fewer and fewer hands. Trump is the frontman. The three richest men in the world (Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg) stood prominently before him when he was sworn in last week. Trump has appointed other billionaires to key positions. Behind them is a coterie of billionaires pushing for more oligarchic control of America (among them, Peter Thiel, Blake Masters, tech entrepreneur David Sacks, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, Palantir adviser Jacob Helberg, and Sequoia Capital’s Doug Leone). Their two key inside players are Musk and JD Vance. The oligarchs are counting on Vance to become president when Trump is incapacitated or dies in office, or clings to power beyond 2028 and turns power over to Vance. Vance will manage the final transition to an oligarchic form of government. Recall that Vance would never have been elected senator from Ohio in 2022 were it not for Thiel’s $15 million investment in him (by far the largest portion of Vance’s campaign fund). Thiel knew what he was buying. Vance had worked for Thiel’s California venture capital firm before running for the Senate and was part of Thiel’s group of rich crypto bros, tech executives, back-to-the-landers, and disaffected far-right intellectuals. Because Thiel had been a major funder of Trump’s 2016 presidential run, he had significant influence with Trump when urging him to pick Vance for vice president. Thiel once wrote: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.” Hello? Freedom is incompatible with democracy only if you view democracy as a potential constraint on your wealth and power. That’s the whole point. Thiel and his fellow billionaire oligarchs want it all. Their intellectual godfather is Curtis Yarvin, a 51-year-old computer engineer who believes that political power in the United States has been held by a liberal amalgam of universities and the mainstream media, whose commitment to equality and justice is eroding social order. Yarvin thinks democratic governments are inefficient and wasteful. They should be replaced with sovereign joint-stock corporations whose major “shareholders” select an executive with total power, who serves at their pleasure. Yarvin refers to the city-state of Singapore as an example of a successful authoritarian regime. The first step toward achieving Yarvin’s vision was offered by Vance in a 2021 podcast — replace “every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state … with our people. And when the courts stop you, stand before the country, and say” – as did Andrew Jackson – that “the chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.” Yarvin’s emphasis on the inefficiency of democratic government is the seed for Musk’s department of government efficiency, itself another step toward Yarvin’s joint-stock corporation of oligarchs. A third step: cryptocurrency substitutes for the U.S. dollar. This would shift financial controls out of a democratically elected system of government and into the hands of oligarchs who control crypto. Make no mistake: Trump’s first week was a catastrophe for many vulnerable people. But the biggest story was his startling initial moves from democracy to oligarchy. My hope lies in Americans noticing this. As I’ve said, not since the Gilded Age of the late 19th century has such vast wealth turned itself into power so unapologetically, unashamedly, and defiantly. Americans don’t abide aristocracy. We were founded in revolt against unaccountable power and wealth. We will not tolerate this barefaced takeover. The backlash, when it comes, will be stunning. Share So glad you can be here today. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber of this community so we can do even more.

Elon Musk frozen out of the West Wing by Trump’s Chief of Staff

Mexico President DESTROYS Trump and REJECTS HIS ORDER

The Economist Magazine Cover For 01/25/2025

Cover Story: America has an imperial presidency Inbox The Economist Unsubscribe 10:02 AM (8 hours ago) to me The Economist Read in browser January 25th 2025 How we chose this week’s image SUBSCRIBER ONLY Cover Story How we chose this week’s image Insert a clear and simple description of the image Edward Carr Deputy editor We went into this week knowing that the news would be dominated by the inauguration of Donald Trump. We expected him to say or do something to stir headline-writers into a frenzy. But we didn’t know what form that something would take—nor how important it would be. That is why we had to be ready for two possibilities. One was intended to hold the front page worldwide if Mr Trump’s sound and fury signified nothing new. The other was that we would have to put the man on the cover—again. Inevitably, perhaps, we ended up with Plan B. One of the lines that leapt out to us from Mr Trump’s inaugural address was his praise of William McKinley, who took office in 1897. In the greatness stakes McKinley is a long way behind America’s Rushmore-ranking presidents. By bringing him up, what was Mr Trump trying to say? McKinley was an imperialist, who added Hawaii, Guam, the Philippines and Puerto Rico to American territory. He loved tariffs and he was backed by the commercial titans of the time. The new “golden age” Mr Trump envisions thus superficially resembles the Gilded Age. We thought about superimposing Mr Trump’s scowl over the face of his lesser-known predecessor. What emerged was a monstrous chimera with an uncanny resemblance to Winston Churchill. That would not do at all. This menacing treatment is much more powerful. It’s remarkable how clearly identifiable Mr Trump is by his eyes alone. Mr Trump wants to be as unencumbered by 20th-century norms as McKinley was in 1897. He has thrown off the governance reforms that were brought in after Watergate. The consensus that America should be a benign superpower, born out of the ashes after 1945, has gone, too. And Mr Trump wants more: to see America unleashed, freed from political correctness, from the bureaucracy and, in some cases, even from the law. Yet the 21st-century presidency is much more powerful than it was in McKinley’s day; and the new imperial president spies enemies to conquer not only abroad—in Greenland and Panama—but at home, too. The problem with this design lies with the hapless William McKinley. We can see 80% of his face and yet he is still completely anonymous. It could be almost anybody. Without instant recognition, the whole design fails. The Economist So we opted for a caricature. Lest Mr Trump look like a doorman at one of his own hotels, we needed to signal that we were peering back in time. We took our inspiration from Project 2025—the programme for government devised by Trump-supporting operatives (and disowned by the candidate during the campaign because it scared off voters). Mr Trump’s second term promises something old and new, an ideology from the railroad era mixed with the ambition to plant the flag on Mars. Project 2025 meets Project 1897. Mr Trump means to turn the presidency’s immense power inward as well as outward, to dominate America as no other president has since the second world war. Politics is in his favour. A long power shift away from the gridlocked Congress has left the courts and the executive in charge. That sets up a clash between Mr Trump and his felt-tip pens on one hand and the judges and their gavels on the other. America’s remaining checks and balances are about to be tested. If there is a single technology America needs to bring about the “thrilling new era of national success” that Mr Trump promised in his inauguration speech, it is generative artificial intelligence. Yet even as Mr Trump was giving his oration, a Chinese firm released the latest impressive large language model (LLM). Suddenly, America’s lead over China in AI looks in danger. We were taken by two visual metaphors for China’s success. One is to treat the cover as a windscreen, and to show Chinese AI catching up in the rear-view mirror. The other is to use a robot as a metonym for the AI that might power it—and to have a muscle-bound mechanical arm. China’s LLMs are not the very best. But they are far cheaper to make. QwQ, owned by Alibaba, an e-commerce giant, was launched in November and is less than three months behind America’s top models. DeepSeek, whose creator was spun out of an investment firm, ranks seventh by one benchmark. It was apparently trained using 2,000 second-rate chips—versus 16,000 first-class chips for Meta’s model, which DeepSeek beats on some rankings. The cost of training an American LLM is tens of millions of dollars and rising. DeepSeek’s owner says it spent less than $6m. Here is the catch-up idea in two different versions. The dragon is scary and the dice are fluffy–or, rather, they contain fluff, but it’s not entirely clear what this has to do with artificial intelligence. The wing mirror lets us get in the joke from “Jurassic Park” about the proximity of a predatory object. But the mirror is on the passenger side and it evokes electric vehicles rather than artificial brains. That is why we preferred this. We now have a skinny Chinese arm-wrestling a dench American—and holding its own. The progress of DeepSeek and QwQ makes clear that China will innovate around obstacles such as an American embargo on cutting-edge chips. If China stays close to the frontier of innovation, it could be the first to make the leap to superintelligence, with world-changing consequences. Some tech whizzes promise that the next wave of discoveries will once again put America far in front. Perhaps. But it would be dangerous to take America’s lead for granted. Cover image • View large image (“Project 1897: The imperial presidency”) • View large image (“China’s lean, mean AI machine”) Backing stories → America has an imperial presidency (Leader) → America really could enter a golden age (United States) → The success of cheap Chinese AI poses a dilemma for Donald Trump (Leader)

OMG! Trump FIRES his OWN IG’S in Friday MIDNIGHT MASSACRE

Pardoned Jan6er IMMEDIATELY ARRESTED... AGAIN!!!

"The Dread Pirate Robert" Is Out Of Jail

Ross Ulbricht is a name that 99% of you have never heard. Before yesterday he was serving two life sentences without the chance of parole. After those sentences were served, he was ordered by a US District Judge in New York City in 2015 to serve an additional 40 years in prison. An inmate serving such a draconian sentence would normally be a serial killer or a large-scale international drug dealer like El Chapo. Yesterday thanks to President Donald Trump, he is now a free man. One could say that "he won the lottery." I will not go into the merits of the pardon. Let us look at the life story of this man. He was born in Austin, Texas forty years ago. He got an undergraduate degree at the University of Dallas and a postgraduate degree at the prestigious Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Ross is a very bright man. He has incredible technical skills. He is a true visionary. Had he chosen to lead an honest life, he could be a billionaire at the level of Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, etc. Ross chose a different direction in life. Perhaps it was the librarian ideology that dominated his life. He saw the potential of The Dark Web and Bitcoin. He formed an entity he called "The Silk Road." He gave himself the pen name "The Dread Pirate Robert." He built an Amazon-like platform on The Dark Web. One could use the Tor Browser to gain access to this platform. All sorts of illegal drugs were for sale. All kinds of illicit weapons were for sale. A multitude of false identity documents were on offer. Information obtained by hacking was for sale. Other contraband was on offer. The platform generated hundreds of millions in sales. Ross earned a commission in Bitcoin worth $13,000,000 or 37,681 Bitcoins. Today these Bitcoins would be worth $376,800,000. Success went to Ross's head. He started to broadcast challenges to the authorities. He did this while living in the San Francisco Bay area. He should have been living in a country with no extradition treaty with the US that gave him citizenship. Massive law enforcement resources were mobilized to find this man and stop him. One low-level IRS criminal agent in New York City cracked through all his barriers and encryptions. Ross was located and arrested without incident at a branch of the San Francisco Public Library. He was extradited to New York City. A massive criminal case was launched against him. He was found guilty of many major crimes including international drug dealing. A woman judge decided to deter others from similar conduct by imposing the draconian sentence that Ross received. His platform was taken down. His $13 million fortune was confiscated. These draconian sentences failed to deter others from setting up similar platforms on The Dark Web. I never venture into this part of the internet. It would not surprise me to hear that a tactical nuclear warhead was for sale in that segment of the web.

New Syrian Government Officially Boots Russia Out of Tartus

Does Gaza Ceasefire Mean Houthis Are Done Attacking Shipping?

Canada MP DESTROYS Trump ON DAY 1

Adam Carolla on Cultural Shifts, DEI, and Trump’s Second Term

Biden makes STUNNING PARDONS to STICK IT to Trump

John Bolton predicts a 'chaotic' second Trump term | LBC

Trump TURNS AGAINST his OWN JAILED Supporters in Court

Trump voters FREAK OUT on Him over CANCELED INAUGURATION

Jon Stewart & Jon Meacham Break Down Trump, Biden & America’s Future | T...

Brad Meltzer "This is The Untold JFK Assassination Plot" I Anthony Scara...

Why Trump health crisis is going viral

What Would Happen If The US Invades Greenland?

Profile photo for Greg Brecht Greg Brecht · Follow Freelance writer, blogger, Floridian, liberal.Dec 27 What would happen if Trump invaded Greenland? If Trump as president ordered the US military to invade Greenland, we simply do not know what would ensue. Greenland has 50,000 people, an area of 836,000 square miles of mostly glacier and permafrost. It also has a strategic location, and according to some, immense mineral resources, as well as significant oil and gas deposits offshore. The US action would be seen as geopolitical theft. Such a move would destroy NATO. War within NATO seems unlikely. It’s more likely that the European Union would block trade with the US, seize American assets in Europe and either imprison or expel American citizens. It would severely damage trade. It would also enable Russian ambitions to take all of Ukraine, the Baltics, Moldava and possibly Finland. It’s worth remembering that both France and Britain have quite potent nuclear deterrence forces that are potentially capable of causing immense damage to the US.

Update from Ukraine | Awesome News! Record Kabooms in Ruzzia | ATACMS, D...

Trump LOSES MIND after TWIST in $450 MILLION FRAUD Case

Prosecutors OUTMANEUVER Trump to FINALLY RELEASE Report

Deep Intel on U. S. Efforts to Buy Greenland

"Disgusting!" Fed up Fox anchor shreds LA wildfire LIES

The Economist Magazine Cover For 01-11-2025

Cover Story: The capitalist revolution Africa needs Inbox The Economist Unsubscribe 10:02 AM (2 hours ago) to me The Economist Read in browser January 11th 2025 How we chose this week’s image SUBSCRIBER ONLY Cover Story How we chose this week’s image Insert a clear and simple description of the image Edward Carr Deputy editor This week we had two covers, on the future of Africa and Donald Trump’s promise to deport undocumented migrants. I also have news of a competition to design your own cover for The Economist, but more on that later. Although we rarely put Africa on our cover, demography is making the continent more important than at any time in the modern era. By 2030 more than half the young people entering the global workforce will be African. By 2035 one in every five people on the planet will live in Africa, compared with one in eight in 2000. Our editorial draws on a special report about what we are calling Africa’s “growth gap”. In the past decade, as much of the world has thrived, Africa has slipped behind. Income per person has fallen from a third of that in the rest of the world in 2000 to a quarter. Output per head may be no higher in 2026 than it was in 2015. Our editorial is about how to put that right. This is a beautiful image, but it tells the wrong story. Africa’s future will be determined in its towns. It depends not on copying and pasting well-meaning proposals by World Bank development economists, but on the enterprise and determination of Africans themselves. Unfortunately, the continent has a long journey ahead. Services, where ever more Africans find work, are less productive than in any other region—and barely more productive than in 2010. For all the talk of using digital technology and clean energy to leapfrog ahead, Africa lacks the 20th-century kit needed to thrive in the 21st. Less than 4% of farmland is irrigated and almost half of sub-Saharan Africans lack electricity. Here are two more ideas that focus on the problem. However, the image of Africa tethered to a spike inevitably recalls slavery; and the bar-charted zebra looks like an ad from Investec. In their very different ways, they distract from our editorial message that the world’s poorest continent should embrace its least fashionable idea: growth powered by open markets and capitalism. These designs represent a break with the past. African leaders need to get serious about growth. They should adopt the self-confident spirit of modernisation seen in East Asia in the 20th century, and today in India and elsewhere. That means building a political consensus in favour of growth. The good news is that a new generation of Africans, born several decades after independence, care a lot more about their careers than they do about colonialism. That is a revolutionary creed for Africa. We liked the energy of the fist and the allusion to Black Power, with a clutch of dollars denoting the importance of a capitalist ethos. Yellow on black was a bit gloomy, so we reversed the colours. If other continents can prosper, so can Africa. It is time its leaders discovered a sense of ambition and optimism. Africa does not require saving. It needs less paternalism, complacency and corruption—and more capitalism. In our American edition we look forward to what will be a signature policy of the Trump administration. Donald Trump has threatened to deport 15m undocumented migrants. That will not happen. Shipping out such a huge number would be extraordinarily expensive and would shock the labour market, raising the prices of goods and services that illegal immigrants help provide. And yet Mr Trump was elected with a clear mandate to deal with the enduring chaos at the border that shook the early years of the Biden presidency. Our cover was about what that would mean. The barbed wire incorporating Mr Trump’s manic moniker is quite something. Given the practical difficulties, he will surely be tempted to focus on theatrical cruelty as a substitute for real action. Expect workplace raids with camera crews in tow, harsh internment in border states and a surge in the number of ICE agents in sanctuary cities. But some of us thought this evoked prison camps rather than deportation. We looked for something different. In Mr Trump’s first term fewer people were actually deported than under Barack Obama. This time he seems to want the focus on immigration to be real. His deputy chief of staff is Stephen Miller, who yearns to restrict legal as well as illegal migration. His border tsar is Tom Homan, one of the inventors of the family-separation policy in Mr Trump’s first term. And he has threatened to deploy the National Guard to help with deportations, whereas previous presidents used soldiers only for logistical support. The deporter-in-chief has barged aside the mother of exiles and is telling the huddled masses where they can put it. Instead of cradling the lamp beside the golden door Mr Trump is pointing the way to the exit. We tried drawing a copper-green president-elect, but a photograph was better. And deporter-in-chief, a title originally bestowed on Mr Obama, was a bit obvious. No Republican politician can outflank Mr Trump on immigration. That creates the scope for a deal that combines effective border enforcement with a right to stay for the 11m or so law-abiding migrants who have long made America their home and who cannot and should not be deported. The chances are that Mr Trump will want to keep immigration as a wedge issue and to pick fights with Democratic governors and mayors. But he also has an opportunity. And now for the competition. Dedicated readers will recognise this cover-length editorial on the virtues of GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as Ozempic and Wegovy, from our edition of October 26th 2024. We would like you to design an alternative cover to ours, with your own headline, and to send it as a PDF attachment to coverstory@economist.com by Monday February 3rd. The three best entries will each receive a copy of our new “Cover Story” book, which assembles our covers of 2024 week by week. Anybody can enter, so please pass on these details to the budding designers among your friends and family. Good luck! Cover image • View large image (“The capitalist revolution Africa needs”) • View large image (“Donald the Deporter”) Backing stories → The capitalist revolution Africa needs (Leader) → Why the economic gap between Africa and the rest of the world is growing (Special report) → Donald the Deporter (Leader) → How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants? (Briefing)

NATO Will Deploy 10 Ships To Protect Undersea Cables Around Finland

Neighborhood Watch Finland NATO will deploy around 10 ships to guard critical undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea this week, in response to recent damage to power and telecommunications cables that has heightened fears of sabotage in the strategically vital region, Newsweek reported. The vessels will remain in the area until April and will be stationed near energy and data cables to deter potential sabotage. The deployment comes after a series of incidents that saw a number of cables and pipelines damaged in recent months. These include disruptions to the Estlink 2 power cable between Finland and Estonia last month, as well as damage to two undersea cables – one linking Finland to Germany (C-Lion 1) and another connecting Lithuania to Sweden – in November. Finnish authorities are investigating the Russian oil tanker “Eagle S,” which allegedly dragged its anchor over the cables, leaving visible marks on the seabed, Politico added. Police recovered an anchor from the Gulf of Finland this week and detained the vessel for further investigation. The Baltic Sea, often referred to as a “NATO lake,” has become a focal point for geopolitical tension following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The region is known for its critical infrastructure and proximity to Russia’s Kaliningrad exclave. Earlier disruptions targeted a gas pipeline between Finland and Estonia in October, as well as the Nord Stream pipelines linking Russia and Germany in 2022. Observers and NATO officials have warned that these undersea cables are vulnerable targets in hybrid warfare, Around 99 percent of the world’s data flows through undersea cables, which are critical for Internet services, communications, and economic activity. The British-led Joint Expeditionary Force, comprising Nordic and Baltic nations, will use artificial intelligence to monitor suspicious vessel activity, including Russia’s “shadow fleet.” NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte vowed to enhance military presence in the Baltic, calling the incidents “deeply concerning.” Finnish Defense Minister Antti Häkkänen welcomed the strengthened NATO and regional collaboration, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding vital infrastructure.

🚨 Fire marshal on whether ARSON suspected in Los Angeles fires

South Krean Troops Are Now In Ukraine

Profile photo for Brent Cooper Brent Cooper · Follow Trial and Appellate Counsel (1993–present)Nov 2 Since Russia has deployed 12,000 regular North Korean troops into the Ukraine War, should the West respond by deploying regular troops into supporting roles in Ukraine to free Ukrainian troops for combat? It appears South Korea is sending troops to Ukraine. The stated purpose is to “monitor” North Korean troops. Apparently they are from intelligence troops. They will have several purposes: Provide intelligence for Ukraine. Collect new intelligence on North Korean capabilities for South Korea Assist in creating deception and confusion to North Korean troops Perhaps even join in the fighting. Putin should be worried he has cracked the door open for other nations to join Ukraine in the fight and others will follow South Korea. 331.9K views View 2,059 upvotes View 18 sharesAnswer requested by George Miller 1 of 12 answers 339 comments from Graham White and more

Supreme Court DENIES Trump Attempt to STOP SENTENCING

LIVE: Michael Cohen REACTS to BREAKING NEWS…Trump LIES

Trump Suffers HUMILIATING DEFEAT in APPEALS… SCOTUS NEXT?!?!

LIVE: Legal AF REACTS to MAJOR Updates Ahead of Trump Sentencing | Legal AF

Actor describes neighbor's rescue an hour before house burned down in wi...

Update from Ukraine | Wow! Deep Strike inside Ruzzia | Kursk operation u...

Ukrainian F-16 Pilot Gets Six Kills in a Single Mission

BOLD Predictions for 2025 | Lichtman Live #100

BOOM! Biden CHECKMATES Trump with PERMANENT TRAP

EX Army Sniper REVEALS SECRET to STOPPING MAGA

Deep Intel on Trump's Mexico War Plan

"The Day of The Jackal"- An Incredible Television Series

In a few moments, I will recommend an incredible television series. It chronicles the life of a professional assassin who is paid up to $100 million for one killing. First, I need to make a point by discussing four incredible men who have passed through my life over the last 40 years. Bob Nicholson came into my life in late 1983. He spent twenty years in the elite British Special Air Services. He retired as a sergeant major. He decided to move his family to Perth, West Australia. He got a sad surprise when he started seeking employment. His incredible military training and achievements meant nothing to employers. He ended up being a uniformed West Australian police officer. In February of 1984, Bob saved my life one morning. When I was severely injured, he carried me with my arm over his shoulder to a nearby medical clinic where I got emergency care. Brian Laurence joined the Rhodesian Army. He was a man of exceptional talent and intelligence. He was picked for the elite Selous Scouts, the special operations branch of the army. When the white minority government was replaced with a black majority government, he was assigned to be the personal bodyguard of the new president Robert Mugabe. Brian did not like the way things were going in Zimbabwe. He decided to leave Zimbabwe. He was allowed to carry $1,000 with him. He moved to Perth, West Australia. He soon saw the same thing that Bob Nicholson saw. Employers gave him no credit for his incredible military training and experience. He ended up being a prison officer. Let us go forward to 1987. I had a job in Los Angeles that allowed me to spend a lot of time in Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico. I met an incredible man-Clyde Tewes. He served for 30 years in the US Marine Corps. He was a gunnery sergeant in the elite US Marine Corps Force Recon unit. He served two harrowing tours in Vietnam. When Clyde retired, he found the same reality facing him that Bob and Brian encountered. His excellent military training and leadership skills counted for nothing with employers. Clyde had a generous pension and medical care from the US Marine Corps. He decided to retire. Tim Bax came into my life 5 years ago. Like Brian Laurence, he served in the Rhodesian army. He became an officer in the elite Selous Scouts, as Brian Lawrence did. When the black government took over and Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, he moved to South Africa. Tim's talent was recognized by an employer in South Africa. He went into private security and did quite well. He became a published author with several books to his credit. He now lives in the U.S. What I have discovered over the years is that around the world there are many men who served in elite special operations units. They are now under-employed or unemployed. With my respect for the 4 men above, anyone in a special operations military unit is a professional killer. A few of these men would accept an assignment to do a high-level assassination if the money was right. "The Day of the Jackal" is an incredible 10-episode series on the Peacock streaming channel in the US. The assassin, The Jackal, is played by the Academy Award-winning British actor Eddie Redmayne. He is an elite British special operations soldier who is recruited by big money interests to assassinate political leaders, business leaders, and media influencers around the world. Here is a link for those who are curious: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt24053860/?ref_=fn_all_ttl_1 This is an incredible series and worth the time to watch. Give thanks to your higher power for your good fortune in life. -JackW

What’s Next in 2025? Chris Cuomo on Politics, Media, and Culture

Most Dangerous Time Since WW2: Can Disaster In 2025 Be Prevented? | Stev...

Update from Ukraine | Wow! HIMARS Visited Ruzzian Marines in Kursk | 155...

MAGA Mike LIFE COLLAPSES as GOP Rejects Him

New Orleans terror attack: death toll rises to 15 | LiveNOW from FOX

4 people seen placing explosives ahead of New Year's Day attack | NewsNa...

New Orleans terror attack: FBI says suspect 'didn't act alone' | LiveNOW...

Trump DERAILS his Entire Term before NEW YEAR

the future of MAGA

BREAKING: IDF Destroys UNDERGROUND Iran Missile Site; Hamas Makes LAST S...

LIVE: Multiple People Feared Dead as SUV Ploughs Into Crowds in Bourbon ...

LIVE: "Mass casualties" after car rams into New Orleans crowd, French Qu...

The Imperial Presidency

America’s Future Under Donald Trump : Yuval Noah Harari's Bold Predictions

Russia SHUTS DOWN Trump IN AN INSTANT…HUMILIATES HIM