Monday, March 31, 2025
Sunday, March 30, 2025
Unburying The Remains of the Third reich
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/magazine/germany-nazi-bones-remains.html?unlocked_article_code=1.704.p8mJ.Th98Ef2Hr8oH&smid=url-share
Saturday, March 29, 2025
The Economist Magazine Cover For 03/29/2025
Cover Story: Elon Musk’s efficiency drive
Inbox
The Economist Unsubscribe
11:02 AM (3 minutes ago)
to me
The Economist
Read in browser
March 29th 2025
How we chose this week’s image
SUBSCRIBER ONLY
Cover Story
How we chose this week’s image
Insert a clear and simple description of the image
Edward Carr
Deputy editor
In most of the world our cover is devoted to Elon Musk and his revolution against the federal government in Washington. In the Middle East and Africa we write about Israel’s remarkable resurgence after the horrors of October 7th 2023, and the hubris that now looms.
Of all the things President Donald Trump has done at home since his inauguration in January, putting the Department of Government Efficiency under Mr Musk has turned out to be the most polarising.
Mr Musk’s fans believe that in the 2010s a priesthood of partisan bureaucrats schemed with the media and universities to impose a progressive agenda on America. To them, dismantling this soft authoritarianism requires rough tactics. By contrast, Mr Musk’s critics see him as a self-dealing villain drunk on far-right ideology.
We started with a moody Musk in black and white and an elevated Elon peering down at the mortals scurrying around Washington like ants. The world’s richest man has transformed at least two industries. Just imagine if he could pull off the same trick with the federal government—an organisation whose annual expenditure of $7trn is roughly equivalent to the combined revenues of America’s 20 biggest companies. Across the West, voters are frustrated because their governments are more adept at slowing things down than at making them go.
We have worked up the super-human Musk. He does, after all, conceive of himself as a saviour who will put people on Mars and turn humankind into a multiplanetary species.
Ordinarily, chances to start government afresh crop up only in times of war, plague or natural disaster. A sympathetic reading of DOGE is that Mr Musk is trying to bring creative destruction to bureaucracies by other means.
But that looks much too optimistic. So far DOGE has broken laws with abandon and destroyed careers. It has lied about waste and seized personal data protected by law. Some federal employees still have to send weekly emails listing five things they did last week. But the inbox is full and they bounce back.
To make this cover work, we needed a lot more edge.
That thought took us to a Cybertruck running amok on America’s most famous lawn. Or perhaps it could be carting off the Capitol dome—which is not too far from the truth, given that DOGE wants to close outfits like the Department of Education that are supposed to fall under the purview of Congress.
These images have an extra piquancy because Tesla has recently recalled a batch of Cybertrucks. But we wanted to show the machinery of the state, rather than the legislature or the White House.
The feathers are flying and the federal government is at risk of becoming roadkill. For the final cover, we jazzed up the eagle, plonked the truck in the desert and gave it a personalised number plate.
Rather than seeking to make government work better, DOGE’s actions so far look as if they are designed to expand the president’s power and root out wrongthink. Facing lawsuits and some adverse rulings, Mr Musk and others have attacked judges, accusing them of staging a coup. Mr Musk—and America—have a huge opportunity. They must not blow it.
Just 18 months ago Israel was in grave peril. Surrounded by enemies, bickering with its main ally in Washington and reeling after Hamas’s attack caused the most murderous day in the country’s history, the Jewish state seemed vulnerable and confused. But it has staged a remarkable turnaround. It is fighting again, in Gaza, in the West Bank, in Lebanon and in Syria and with full American backing.
Unfortunately, its military supremacy comes with bitter strife at home and a danger of overextension.
We started with a photograph of the West Bank. But it struck our correspondents as out of date. The army is waging its biggest offensive in the West Bank in decades. More than 40,000 Palestinians have been displaced from four refugee camps in the north. Far-right lawmakers are pushing ahead with plans to expand Jewish settlements.
Or perhaps we could go with a collage of the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu. His government is using aggressive tactics to curb the independence of Israel’s institutions. In recent days the cabinet has endorsed the firing of the head of the Shin Bet, the domestic security agency, and of the attorney-general. The two officials happen to be involved in investigations of Mr Netanyahu’s aides over allegations of graft and other sins. The prime minister says he is innocent.
We preferred this idea, however. Israel is planting flags—in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank.
This new, hegemonic Israel is the product in part of the lingering trauma of October 7th. Before the massacre Israel sought to avoid all-out conflict, contenting itself with periodic strikes against its foes, to assassinate threatening leaders or destroy sophisticated weapons. When it fought, as it did several times against Hamas, it kept the wars short. The goal was to deter and weaken its adversaries, not to obliterate them.
In hindsight, many Israeli generals and spies see that policy as naive. They are no longer willing to tolerate threats on their borders—even hypothetical ones. The trouble is that hegemony will impose a heavy burden on the Israeli army, on society and on the economy. Can Israel carry it?
You can browse all of our covers from 2024—and learn about the creative decisions that went into each one—in this interactive Cover Story annual.
Related
→
Is Elon Musk remaking government or breaking it? (Leader)
→
Elon Musk is powersliding through the federal government (United States)
→
Israel’s expansionism is a danger to others—and itself (Leader)
→ An unrestrained Israel is reshaping the Middle East (Briefing)
Cover image
•
View large image (“Elon Musk’s efficiency drive”)
•
View large image (“Israel’s hubris”)
Thursday, March 27, 2025
A Hot Earth Is Normal
Some Like It Hot
Humans may struggle to survive in hot weather, but the planet does just fine.
In fact, the Earth existed in a greenhouse climate free of ice caps for much of its history and only developed its ice caps through a lucky coincidence.
A new study shows that ice caps formed due to a fortunate combination of low global volcanism and widely dispersed continents with large mountains, which facilitated global rainfall, and enhanced processes that remove carbon from the atmosphere, said researchers at the University of Adelaide in Australia.
“The important implication here is that the Earth’s natural climate regulation mechanism appears to favor a warm and high-CO2 world with no ice caps, not the partially glaciated and low-CO2 world we have today,” explained Andrew Merdith, lead author of the study.
Researchers believe Earth’s general tendency towards a warm climate has generally prevented catastrophic “snowball Earth” glaciations, allowing life to prosper.
Researchers have long tried to explain the cold intervals in Earth’s history by following clues such as decreased CO2 emissions from volcanoes, the reaction of CO2 with certain rocks, and increased carbon storage by forests.
Now, researchers were able to conduct the first comprehensive test of all these cooling processes using a new long-term 3D Earth model developed because of advances in computing.
The team concluded that no single process could create these cold climates and that the cooling was produced by the combined effects of several processes that took place at the same time.
“Over its long history, the Earth likes it hot, but our human society does not,” said co-author Benjamin Mills, adding that this study carries implications for global warming and that we should not always expect Earth to return to the cooler climate of the pre-industrial age.
Wednesday, March 26, 2025
Saturday, March 22, 2025
Nursing Is the Toughest Major to Get into at the University of California System
UC’s most competitive major has a 1% acceptance rate, and it’s not computer science
By Nanette Asimov,
Higher Education Reporter
March 22, 2025
Gift Article
Magdalena Guerrero, a sophomore at CSU East Bay in Hayward, was unable to get into the school’s nursing program because she applied slightly too early. Administrators said they could not make an exception for her application because the program is so competitive.
Magdalena Guerrero, a sophomore at CSU East Bay in Hayward, was unable to get into the school’s nursing program because she applied slightly too early. Administrators said they could not make an exception for her application because the program is so competitive.
Santiago Mejia/S.F. Chronicle
Winning admission into the University of California’s most competitive majors — including computer science, engineering and business — is about as likely as hitting a home run your first time at bat.
Yet even those subjects are not the hardest to get into. That honor belongs to nursing, for which you might have to hit two home runs. In a row.
Just 1% of the nearly 6,000 yearly applicants to UC’s undergraduate nursing programs, at UCLA and UC Irvine, are permitted to walk through the door.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
See more on majors: Look up acceptance rates for every UC, CSU major
Most popular majors: List of 'impacted' and high-demand majors at every UC and CSU
College Guide: Key data and acceptance rates for every UC and CSU
Data Tools: Majors that lead to the best-paying jobs for UC and CSU graduates
Nursing is also notoriously hard to get into at 17 of the 20 California State University campuses offering the program — even though hospitals across the state are short the equivalent of more than 40,000 full-time nurses, as UCSF reported in 2021. Nursing jobs pay well in California – typically around $120,000 — and thousands of brainy, compassionate students want in.
Magdalena Guerrero is one of them. The Cal State East Bay sophomore chose nursing as a high-school freshman and never wavered.
“I love nursing so much,” said Guerrero, 19, who in October applied for next fall’s nursing program at the Hayward campus, a 12-minute commute from her Union City home.
“I’m super-competitive,” said Guerrero, a straight-A student who completed her nursing prerequisites last fall and sometimes spent 13 hours a day in the library, her head in the books from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. “I loved it. I ate there — I brought my snacks. I love studying. I love the knowledge.”
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
‘Even more selective’ than Ivy League
The story of how and why Cal State East Bay rejected Guerrero’s nursing application is the story of why that major is the most crowded — and confounding — across all public universities in California.
“We’re even more selective than getting into Yale,” Mark Lazenby said of UC Irvine’s nursing school, where he’s the dean. (The Ivy League school took 6.53% of applicants last fall.)
“A lot of young people want to become nurses,” Lazenby said. “They want to do good with their lives. We hear this over and over again — that nursing can lead to gainful employment and a lot of career options. At the same time, it’s meaningful work that benefits society.”
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
By 2030, with every baby boomer locked into old age, the need for nurses will only skyrocket, he said. So what’s stopping California’s universities from welcoming every applicant?
A view of the UCLA campus from the top of the Janns Steps.
A view of the UCLA campus from the top of the Janns Steps.
Jen Osborne/Special to the S.F. Chronicle
Money is the driving factor
At UC Irvine and UCLA — which together admitted 118 nursing students out of 11,776 who applied in 2023, the most recent data available — the answer is money.
UC Irvine’s engineering school, for example, spends less than $10,000 a year to educate each student. The nursing school spends at least twice that amount, said Lazenby.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
A lecture hall packed with engineering students needs but one professor. But in nursing, where the stakes are about patient survival, every group of 10 students needs a single, attentive instructor.
Also expensive: computerized mannequins, which reside in hospital simulation rooms and suffer sudden heart attacks and massive strokes. These cost a couple hundred thousand dollars each, Lazenby said.
At CSU, where 20 of the 23 campuses offer nursing, only Dominguez Hills, Monterey Bay and Northridge report no overcrowding.
Schools ration seats because it’s hard for them to hire enough qualified instructors.
“Anybody who comes to teach full time takes about a 50% pay cut compared to working at the hospital,” said Elaine Musselman, director of San Francisco State’s nursing school, which, like many CSU campuses, struggles with the hiring problem.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
As a result, San Francisco State’s nursing school is offering admission to just 28 of its 328 applicants for next fall. That’s 8.5%, compared with the school’s 84% admission rate overall.
The campuses try to get around the problem by inviting full-time nurses to teach part time, maybe once a week.
People sit in a courtyard outside the Health and Social Sciences building at San Francisco State University last September.
People sit in a courtyard outside the Health and Social Sciences building at San Francisco State University last September.
Lea Suzuki/The Chronicle
Hosting by hospitals required
But another reason for the overcrowding is unique to nursing programs: They are required to partner with hospitals that are willing to host and teach students in actual healthcare settings. Engineering, business and computer science programs never encounter this issue.
“Nursing is very hands on, so they can’t just learn by the textbook,” Musselman said. “You need to work with real people.”
These are called clinical placements, and there aren’t enough of them. California has more than 140 nursing programs, many of them at community colleges or more costly private colleges, and all are competing for clinical placements.
About 15 years ago, hospitals generally paired one clinical instructor with up to 12 students at a time, once a week.
Today, hospitals tend to host no more than eight students at a time, which requires schools to arrange for placements twice a week so every student can participate.
The pandemic’s massive nurse burnout is only part of the reason for limiting the student groups, although this is changing as COVID recedes. Another reason is the domino effect of hospitals increasingly sending patients home to recuperate instead of admitting them. Those who stay tend to be sicker, which in turn leaves nurses with less time to help students, Musselman said.
Magdalena Guerrero said she was devastated when her application to the highly competitive nursing program at CSU East Bay in Hayward was rejected because of a timing error.
Magdalena Guerrero said she was devastated when her application to the highly competitive nursing program at CSU East Bay in Hayward was rejected because of a timing error.
Santiago Mejia/S.F. Chronicle
‘It’s awful’: No leniency for application glitch
This is the world into which thousands of California students hope to enter each year, including Guerrero, the Cal State East Bay sophomore.
Last semester, as she completed her last two pre-nursing requirements, earning As in human anatomy II and microbiology, Guerrero’s excitement grew. She beat the deadline for submitting her application for next fall’s nursing program, then waited for April, when she expected good news to arrive.
Instead, she heard from the administration on Feb. 17. She had just finished a psychology class and had sat down to do homework when she noticed the email.
“I was super excited,” she said.
But the message contained bad news. It said Guerrero had been disqualified because her transcript lacked her two final prerequisites — the ones she had aced. In her exuberance, Guerrero had sent in her application a shade too early.
If it had been any other major at Cal State East Bay, a school that — like many CSU campuses — is losing enrollment, administrators would have bent over backward to fix the glitch and help the stellar student join her preferred major.
“But this is how narrow the bottleneck is for nursing,” said Monika Eckfield, chair of Cal State East Bay’s nursing department. “If we make an exception for her, then we have to it for hundreds of others.”
Guerrero felt devastated.
“I felt something inside of me kind of, like, broke,” she said. “I blamed myself over and over. The letter took away my spark. I’m just now getting on my feet.”
Guerrero said she recognizes that nursing is “so overcrowded they couldn’t give me a second chance.” Still, she said, “I wish they could have been more lenient. I can’t imagine how many students are going through the same thing. It’s awful.”
Students and faculty travel through the UC Irvine campus in 2023. The acceptance rate for the school’s undergraduate nursing program is just 1%.
Students and faculty travel through the UC Irvine campus in 2023. The acceptance rate for the school’s undergraduate nursing program is just 1%.
Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
A search for solutions
UC Irvine turns away 99% of nursing applicants: 5,800 students last year. Lazenby, the dean, called on the state to invest more money not only in traditional nursing education, but also in the kind of research-intensive schooling that UC provides to its nursing students. All professors have doctorates and teach their students to interpret medical research or to become researchers themselves. Many students go on to graduate school and become hospital leaders.
“The state has to decide whether it’s going to invest in research-intensive nursing education, because it is costly,” Lazenby said. “Yet, the value of human lives should not be pitted against that cost. We shouldn’t say, ‘We’ll educate nurses on the cheap.”
It’s a hope that became a little less likely after Thursday, when UC system President Michael Drake announced that the university was in such financial jeopardy that a systemwide hiring freeze was necessary. One reason, he said, was a proposed 8% funding cut from the state, which Gov. Gavin Newsom has also recommended at CSU. However, improving state finances could erase that problem.
More of a problem, Drake said, is the potential loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in research funding that Trump administration officials are threatening to withhold from universities – as they have already done at Columbia University — to punish what they have said was an insufficient response against pro-Palestinian protesters on campus last year.
Meanwhile, the state’s public universities are strategizing to figure out how to enroll more nursing students.
At San Francisco State, a 2023 partnership with Sutter Health to guarantee clinical placements for eight students over four semesters “allowed us to increase our enrollment by 25%,” Musselman said.
While Cal State East Bay accepted just 48 of its roughly 500 nursing applicants for next fall, Eckfield said she hopes that will improve with a pending reorganization of scattered programs — nursing, kinesiology, social work, public health, speech and hearing – into a single College of Health.
“So even if students come in with the intention of (entering) the nursing program, if they don’t get in, they’ll see that it’s not the end of the road for them. They can stay and finish out their bachelor's degree,” Eckfield said.
Sophomore Magdalena Guerrero holds her water bottle, covered with nursing-themed stickers, at CSU East Bay in Hayward.
Sophomore Magdalena Guerrero holds her water bottle, covered with nursing-themed stickers, at CSU East Bay in Hayward.
Santiago Mejia/S.F. Chronicle
Still determined
Guerrero has no intention of giving up nursing.
Cal State East Bay has a different nursing program at its Concord campus — 90 minutes from Guerrero’s home — and she is about to apply there for spring 2026. She could reapply to the closer Hayward campus, but the earliest she could get in would be fall 2026.
“What if I didn’t get into Hayward a year from now?” Guerrero said. “Because nursing here in California is SO competitive, I cannot miss an opportunity.
“I understand that I’m young. But at the same time, I have this passion, this spark. I’m willing do anything — even if it takes an hour and 30 minutes on BART,” she said. “Nursing is everything to me.”
Reach Nanette Asimov: nasimov@sfchronicle.com; Threads: @NanetteAsimov
March 22, 2025
Photo of Nanette Asimov
Nanette Asimo
Friday, March 21, 2025
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Monday, March 17, 2025
Please Pay Close Attention To Elon Musk's Artificial Intelligence Company
Madame President:
Your Monday morning briefing...As always, my radar is on a 360-degree sweep looking for stories overlooked by traditional media that are very important to you.
Elon Musk's car company Tesla is taking a huge beating right now. Sales of his cars are sharply down worldwide. Tesla shares are taking a big beating. There is even violence being directed at Tesla owners and facilities worldwide.
Elon has another venture that is booming. In 2023 he formed X Artificial Intelligence. This company includes a program called Grok to build a supercomputer in Memphis. Musk has already raised $6 billion in venture capital for this project. He is seeking a $75 billion valuation for X A.I. When this company succeeds, Musk will be "The King of Artificial Intelligence" for the Western world. With the control of Artificial Intelligence and the social media platform X (Twitter) Musk will control the information flow for the Western world. ("A man or woman with one eye is king in the land of the blind.") When we add in his political power one could infer that he would become the most powerful human in the Western world. The word "King" comes to mind. Please reflect on this carefully.
Be careful out there!
Stay "Far from the madding crowd."
Amo-a,
-Jack
Sunday, March 16, 2025
How Much Is Vice President J.D. Vance Worth?
GOBankingRates
How Much Is Vice President JD Vance Worth? The Answer May Shock You
Caitlyn Moorhead
Sat, March 15, 2025 at 4:07 PM PDT·3 min read
147
Francis Chung / Pool via CNP / SplashNews.com / Shutterstock.com
Francis Chung / Pool via CNP / SplashNews.com / Shutterstock.com
In the last few years, JD Vance has gone from being an American author, political commentator, venture capitalist and holding an Ohio Senate seat to being the Vice President of the United States. Chosen as the controversial running mate for President Donald Trump in 2024, he is now a leading member of the Republican party in 2025.
Be Aware: If Trump Eliminates the Department of Education, Do You Still Have To Pay Your Student Loans?
Read Next: These 10 Used Cars Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle
With all of these money-making ventures and current political clout, it may or may not surprise you what Vance earns in a year or even shows for his all-around estimated wealth. Here’s a sneak peek into his finances.
Quick Take: JD Vance’s Net Worth
His memoir “Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis” and its film adaptation — directed by Ron Howard and released by Netflix — made him a public figure. However, he now has a few more financial disclosures under his belt.
Here are a few key takeaways about Vance’s estimated net worth and sources of his income:
Estimated total net worth: $10 million
Salary as Vice President: $235,100 each year he serves
Real estate holdings: $4 million
Memoir royalties: Between $15,000 to $50,000 every year
Bitcoin: Between $250,000 to $500,000
Ownership of venture capital firm, Narya Capital Fund I: Between $500,000 to $1 million
Consider This: Trump Wants To Eliminate Social Security Taxes: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make This Winter
The Early Life and Career of JD Vance
James David Vance (born James Donald Bowman) was born to Donald Bowman and Bev Vance in Middletown, Ohio, on Aug. 2, 1984.
His parents split when he was very young — his father leaving the family behind — and he and his sister were mostly raised by his maternal grandparents. He wrote that his childhood was abusive, and his mother battled addiction while enduring a string of bad relationships.
After graduating from high school, he joined the Marines. And following his discharge, he attended Ohio State University where he graduated with a degree in political science and philosophy before attending Yale Law School. Upon earning his law degree, he relocated to San Francisco, where he worked in corporate law.
In 2016, his book was published and he returned to Ohio, where he planned to embark on a political career. Vance met his wife Usha Chilukuri while at Yale Law School. They were married in 2014, and share three children together.
Final Take To GO: The Wealth of JD Vance
The bottom line is that any political figure that has reached the heights of Vance will have some pretty high earning potential. Though he was already making a good living before becoming Vice President, now with Trump’s support in his back pocket along with his wallet, his wealth building doesn’t show any signs of slowing down.
Michelle Tompkins contributed to the reporting for this article.
Editor’s note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on GOBankingRates.com.
More From GOBankingRates
4 SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Early 2025
How Paychecks Would Look in Each State If Trump Dropped Federal Income Tax
5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025
10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: How Much Is Vice President JD Vance Worth? The Answer May Shock You
View comments (147)
Wednesday, March 12, 2025
Sunday, March 9, 2025
Trump Wants To Cut Funding To 10 Universities Including U.C. Berkeley Over Anto Semitism
Bay Area
Trump wants to cut funding to 10 schools over antisemitism. UC Berkeley is one
By Rachel Swan,
Reporter
Updated March 8, 2025 8:58 p.m.
Gift Article
A flyer on antisemitism is posted outside a UC Berkeley office. UC Berkeley is among 10 colleges and universities the Trump administration targeted for possible withdrawal of federal funds, over allegations they created a hostile environment for Jewish students and faculty.
A flyer on antisemitism is posted outside a UC Berkeley office. UC Berkeley is among 10 colleges and universities the Trump administration targeted for possible withdrawal of federal funds, over allegations they created a hostile environment for Jewish students and faculty.
Gabrielle Lurie/The Chronicle 2024
Show More
UC Berkeley is reportedly among 10 schools being targeted by President Donald Trump’s administration for withdrawal of federal funds, which could potentially sap the institution of millions of dollars.
Officials at the Department of Justice created a list of schools that could face punitive measures amid claims that they have allowed antisemitism to pervade their campuses, the New York Times reported.
Federal law enforcement had already announced an investigation of UC Berkeley and four other universities last month, saying the Justice Department would determine whether campus administrators, students and faculty had engendered an “antisemitic hostile work environment.”
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
The list published by the Times includes two other universities in California — UCLA and the University of Southern California — as well as Northwestern University, John Hopkins University, New York University, Harvard, Columbia, George Washington University and the University of Minnesota.
Berkeley law student Adam Pukier, left, helps a pro-Israeli demonstrator cross UC Berkeley’s Strawberry Creek last March. A group of more than 100 pro-Israeli demonstrators crossed the creek, largely avoiding confrontations with pro-Palestinian demonstrators holding a banner across Sather Gate.
Berkeley law student Adam Pukier, left, helps a pro-Israeli demonstrator cross UC Berkeley’s Strawberry Creek last March. A group of more than 100 pro-Israeli demonstrators crossed the creek, largely avoiding confrontations with pro-Palestinian demonstrators holding a banner across Sather Gate.
Noah Berger/Special to the Chronicle 2024
It was not immediately clear how much money UC Berkeley stands to lose if the Justice Department finds that the allegations of a hostile work environment are valid. This week, Trump revoked about $400 million in federal grants, awards and contracts slated for Columbia, accusing the school of “continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.”
Spokespeople for the department did not respond to a series of questions from the Chronicle on Saturday evening.
In late January, Trump signed an executive order aiming to clamp down on antisemitism, with an explicit pledge to “marshal all federal resources” to quell any perceived animosity toward Jewish students and faculty, a sentiment that White House officials said had “exploded” since Hamas launched a coordinated attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. That invasion killed about 1,200 people, and militants kidnapped hundreds more, while Israel’s retaliatory airstrikes and blockade of humanitarian aid in Gaza have killed tens of thousands of Palestinians.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
A woman holds up an Israeli flag during a rally held in support of the nation at UC Berkeley's Sproul Plaza in October 2023.
A woman holds up an Israeli flag during a rally held in support of the nation at UC Berkeley's Sproul Plaza in October 2023.
Jessica Christian/The Chronicle 2023
Protests have swept college campuses over the past year and a half as the Israel-Hamas war all but decimated the Gaza Strip and displaced much of the population. Students erected tents on university lawns to show support for Palestine and opposition to Zionism.
At UC Berkeley, anti-Israel demonstrators broke down a door and smashed a window at Zellerbach Playhouse to disrupt a talk by an Israeli lawyer last year. Days later, Jewish students and their allies marched to pressure the university to crack down on antisemitic speech and violence.
Administrators at UC Berkeley highlighted their commitment to stamping out antisemitism in a statement Saturday, responding to the Justice Department’s threat to claw back funding. In the statement, administrators cited the Chancellor’s Advisory Committee on Jewish Student Life and Campus Climate, formed in 2015, as well as the Antisemitism Education Initiative developed four years later, to train new students, residence hall staff and campus government leaders how to recognize bias against their Jewish peers.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
“We will respond to any complaints or allegations through the process prescribed by the DOJ,” the statement said, adding that UC Berkeley has rules and procedures to address antisemitic incidents, and administrators intend to comply with them.
Reach Rachel Swan: rswan@sfchronicle.com
March 8, 2025|Updated March 8
Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Monday, March 3, 2025
How Does The Trump Presidency End?
Profile photo for Tomaž Vargazon
Tomaž Vargazon
·
Follow
Practicing atheistFeb 17
How do you think Trump's presidency will end?
Let me use one of Ramsays’ quotes on this one.
If you think this has a happy ending, you haven’t been paying attention
There is no good way for the end of the Trump ‘47. The baseline scenario is USA is turned into a hybrid regime, akin to pre-2014 (-ish) Russia: the president and the parliament (Congress and Senate) is fixed and will be won by the Republicans with a majority control every single time, forever. This will be achieved by a combination of cheating, lawsuits and directing the DOJ to start investigations and prosecutions against anyone who is a serious threat to their power. Courts will work to further the power of the Republican party. There will be some genuine political opposition, mainly at mayoral and state level, but they will be locked out from real power at the federal level and hamstrung by courts. No opposition, Democrat or some other party, will ever be able to seriously challenge the Republicans for power.
The best-case scenario is hardly any better: the backlash in 2028 election is so massive no amount of cheating is able to hide it and the Democrats manage to cling power back. However they now face the GOP deep state that will hamstring every single change or improvement and work to make the country ungovernable. The country will lurch from crisis to crisis, intermittently experiencing periods of crisis (when Democrats are in power) and active dismantling of beneficial institutions (when Republicans are). This setup is not stable however and it almost certainly ends up as either the baseline or the worst-case scenario below. It’s only marginally possible for sanity to return to right-wing politicis, and only if the GOP splits first.
The worst-case scenario is the backlash does give Democrats a clean win, but a combination of cheating, electioneering and lawfare enables the Republicans to cling on to power. Chaos ensues and rips the country apart again.
But hey, expensive eggs right? And Haitians eating cats and dogs, that had to be stopped.
267.1K views
View 5,344 upvotes
View 78 shares
1 of 438 answers
Sunday, March 2, 2025
Saturday, March 1, 2025
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)